Gait & Posture
Volume 28, Issue 1 , Pages 127-134, July 2008

Characterizing head motion in three planes during combined visual and base of support disturbances in healthy and visually sensitive subjects

  • E.A. Keshner

      Affiliations

    • Sensory Motor Performance Program, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60611, United States
    • Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, United States
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Current address: Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health Professions, Temple University, 3307 N. Broad Street - Jones Hall 600, Philadelphia, PA 19140, United States. Tel.: +1 215 707 4824; fax: +1 215 707 7500.
  • ,
  • Y. Dhaher

      Affiliations

    • Sensory Motor Performance Program, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60611, United States
    • Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, United States
    • Biomedical Engineering Department, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, United States

Received 16 March 2007; received in revised form 31 October 2007; accepted 7 November 2007. published online 03 January 2008.

Abstract 

Multiplanar environmental motion could generate head instability, particularly if the visual surround moves in planes orthogonal to a physical disturbance. We combined sagittal plane surface translations with visual field disturbances in 12 healthy (29–31 years) and 3 visually sensitive (27–57 years) adults. Center of pressure (COP), peak head angles, and RMS values of head motion were calculated and a three-dimensional model of joint motion was developed to examine gross head motion in three planes. We found that subjects standing quietly in front of a visual scene translating in the sagittal plane produced significantly greater (p<0.003) head motion in yaw than when on a translating platform. However, when the platform was translated in the dark or with a visual scene rotating in roll, head motion orthogonal to the plane of platform motion significantly increased (p<0.02). Visually sensitive subjects having no history of vestibular disorder produced large, delayed compensatory head motion. Orthogonal head motions were significantly greater in visually sensitive than in healthy subjects in the dark (p<0.05) and with a stationary scene (p<0.01). We concluded that motion of the visual field could modify compensatory response kinematics of a freely moving head in planes orthogonal to the direction of a physical perturbation. These results suggest that the mechanisms controlling head orientation in space are distinct from those that control trunk orientation in space. These behaviors would have been missed if only COP data were considered. Data suggest that rehabilitation training can be enhanced by combining visual and mechanical perturbation paradigms.

Keywords: Orientation, Virtual environment, Posture, Visual dependence

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0966-6362(07)00267-6

doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.11.003

Gait & Posture
Volume 28, Issue 1 , Pages 127-134, July 2008