Gait & Posture
Volume 23, Issue 2 , Pages 200-205 , February 2006

Walking trajectory in neglect patients

  • Rients B. Huitema

      Affiliations

    • Centre for Rehabilitation, University Hospital Groningen, P.O. Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +31 50 3614659; fax: +31 50 3611706.
    • ,
  • Wiebo H. Brouwer

      Affiliations

    • Neuropsychology Unit, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
    • ,
  • At L. Hof

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Human Movement Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
    • ,
  • Rienk Dekker

      Affiliations

    • Centre for Rehabilitation, University Hospital Groningen, P.O. Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
    • ,
  • Theo Mulder

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Human Movement Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
    • ,
  • Klaas Postema

      Affiliations

    • Centre for Rehabilitation, University Hospital Groningen, P.O. Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands

Received 19 May 2004 ,Revised 4 December 2004 ,Accepted 12 February 2005.

References 

  1. Kalra L, Perez I, Gupta S, Wittink M. The influence of visual neglect on stroke rehabilitation. Stroke. 1997;28:1386–1391
  2. Cherney LR, Halper AS, Kwasnica CM, Harvey RL, Zhang M. Recovery of functional status after right hemisphere stroke: relationship with unilateral neglect. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82:322–328
  3. Ween JE, Alexander MP, D’Esposito M, Roberts M. Factors predictive of stroke outcome in a rehabilitation setting. Neurology. 1996;47:388–392
  4. Katz N, Hartman-Maeir A, Ring H, Soroker N. Functional disability and rehabilitation outcome in right hemisphere damaged patients with and without unilateral spatial neglect. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80:379–384
  5. Jehkonen M, Ahonen JP, Dastidar P, Koivisto AM, Laippala P, Vilkki J, et al. Visual neglect as a predictor of functional outcome 1 year after stroke. Acta Neurol Scand. 2000;101:195–201
  6. Katz N, Hartman-Maeir A, Ring H, Soroker N. Functional disability and rehabilitation outcome in right hemisphere damaged patients with and without unilateral spatial neglect. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80:379–384
  7. Denes G, Semenza C, Stoppa E, Lis A. Unilateral spatial neglect and recovery from hemiplegia: a follow-up study. Brain. 1982;105:543–552
  8. Paolucci S, Antonucci G, Guariglia C, Magnotti L, Pizzamiglio L, Zoccolotti P. Facilitatory effect of neglect rehabilitation on the recovery of left hemiplegic stroke patients: a cross-over study. J Neurol. 1996;243:308–314
  9. Verlander D, Hayes A, McInnes JK, Liddle RJ, Liddle GW, Clarke GE, et al. Assessment of clients with visual spatial disorders: a pilot study. Visual Impair Res. 2000;2:129–142
  10. Robertson IH, Tegner R, Goodrich SJ, Wilson C. Walking trajectory and hand movements in unilateral left neglect: a vestibular hypothesis. Neuropsychologia. 1994;32:1495–1502
  11. Berti A, Smania N, Rabuffetti M, Ferrarin M, Spinazzola L, D’Amico A, et al. Coding of far and near space during walking in neglect patients. Neuropsychology. 2002;16:390–399
  12. Tromp E, Dinkla A, Mulder T. Walking through doorways: an analysis of navigation skills in patients with neglect. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 1995;5:319–331
  13. Grossi D, Lepore M, Napolitano A, Trojano L. On selective left neglect during walking in a child. Brain Cognition. 2001;47:539–544
  14. Turnbull OH, McGeorge P. Lateral bumping: a normal-subject analog to the behaviour of patients with hemispatial neglect?. Brain Cognition. 1998;37:31–33
  15. Rushton SK, Harris JM, Lloyd MR, Wann JP. Guidance of locomotion on foot uses perceived target location rather than optic flow. Curr Biol. 1998;8:1191–1194
  16. Hollands MA, Patla AE, Vickers JN. Look where you’re going!: gaze behaviour associated with maintaining and changing the direction of locomotion. Exp Brain Res. 2002;143:221–230
  17. Karnath HO. Subjective body orientation in neglect and the interactive contribution of neck muscle proprioception and vestibular stimulation. Brain. 1994;117:1001–1012
  18. Rossetti Y, Rode G, Pisella L, Farne A, Li L, Boisson D, et al. Prism adaptation to a rightward optical deviation rehabilitates left hemispatial neglect. Nature. 1998;395:166–169
  19. Jackson SR, Newport R. Prism adaptation produces neglect-like patterns of hand path curvature in healthy adults. Neuropsychologia. 2001;39:810–814
  20. Carine M, Pisella L, Halligan PW, Luaute J, Rode G, Boisson D, et al. Simulating unilateral neglect in normals using prism adaptation: implications for theory. Neuropsychologia. 2003;41:25–39
  21. Harris MG, Carre G. Is optic flow used to guide walking while wearing a displacing prism?. Perception. 2001;30:811–818
  22. Huitema RB, Hof AL, Postema K. Ultrasonic motion analysis system-measurement of temporal and spatial gait parameters. J Biomech. 2002;35:837–842
  23. Gauthier L, Dehaut F, Joanette Y. The Bells Test: a quantitative and qualitative test for visual neglect. Int J Clin Neuropsychol. 1989;11:49–54
  24. Schenkenberg T, Bradford DC, Ajax ET. Line bisection and unilateral visual neglect in patients with neurologic impairment. Neurology. 1980;30:509–517
  25. Collen FM, Wade DT, Robb GF, Bradshaw CM. The Rivermead mobility index: a further development of the Rivermead motor assessment. Int Disabil Stud. 1991;13:50–54
  26. Holden MK, Gill KM, Magliozzi MR, Nathan J, Piehl BL. Clinical gait assessment in the neurologically impaired. Reliability and meaningfulness. Phys Ther. 1984;64:35–40
  27. Schubert M, Bohner C, Berger W, Sprundel M, Duysens JE. The role of vision in maintaining heading direction: effects of changing gaze and optic flow on human gait. Exp Brain Res. 2003;150:163–173
  28. Harris JM, Bonas W. Optic flow and scene structure do not always contribute to the control of human walking. Vision Res. 2002;42:1619–1626
  29. Kerrigan DC, Frates EP, Rogan S, Riley PO. Hip hiking and circumduction: quantitative definitions. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;79:247–252
  30. Olney SJ, Richards C. Hemiparetic gait following stroke. Part I. Characteristics. Gait Posture. 1996;4(2):136–148
  31. Lamontagne A, Paquet N, Fung J. Postural adjustments to voluntary head motions during standing are modified following stroke. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2003;18(9):832–842

PII: S0966-6362(05)00027-5

doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2005.02.003

Gait & Posture
Volume 23, Issue 2 , Pages 200-205 , February 2006

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution