Gait & Posture
Volume 25, Issue 1 , Pages 49-55 , January 2007

Field of view and base of support width influence postural responses to visual stimuli during quiet stance

  • Jefferson W. Streepey

      Affiliations

    • SMPP, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: SMPP, The Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, 345 East Superior St., Chicago, IL 60611, USA. Tel.: +1 312 238 5828; fax: +1 312 238 2208.
    • ,
  • Robert V. Kenyon

      Affiliations

    • Department of Computer Science, University of Illinois-Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
    • ,
  • Emily A. Keshner

      Affiliations

    • SMPP, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
    • Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA

Received 4 May 2005 ,Revised 6 December 2005 ,Accepted 30 December 2005.

References 

  1. Tossavainen T, Juhola M, Pyykko I, Toppila E, Aalto H, Honkavaara P. Towards virtual reality stimulation in force platform posturography. Medinfo. 2001;10:854–857
  2. Keshner EA, Kenyon RV, Langston J. Postural responses exhibit multisensory dependencies with discordant visual and support surface motion. J Vestib Res. 2004;14:307–319
  3. Akiduki H, Nishiike S, Watanabe H, Matsuoka K, Kubo T, Takeda N. Visual-vestibular conflict induced by virtual reality in humans. Neurosci Lett. 2003;340:197–200
  4. Borger LL, Whitney SL, Redfern MS, Furman JM. The influence of dynamic visual environments on postural sway in the elderly. J Vestib Res. 1999;9:197–205
  5. Lishman JR, Lee DN. The autonomy of visual kinaesthesis. Perception. 1973;2:287–294
  6. Querner V, Krafczyk S, Dieterich M, Brandt T. Patients with somatoform phobic postural vertigo: the more difficult the balance task, the better the balance performance. Neurosci Lett. 2000;285:21–24
  7. Mesure S, Amblard B, Cremieux J. Effect of physical training on head-hip co-ordinated movements during unperturbed stance. Neuroreport. 1997;8:3507–3512
  8. Mergner T, Schweigart G, Maurer C, Blümle A. Human postural responses to motion of real and virtual visual environments under different support base conditions. Exp Brain Res. 2005;167:535–536
  9. Kawakita T, Kuno S, Miyake Y, Watanabe S. Body sway induced by depth linear vection in reference to central and peripheral visual field. Jpn J Physiol. 2000;50:315–321
  10. Bardy BG, Warren WH, Kay BA. The role of central and peripheral vision in postural control during walking. Percept Psychophys. 1999;61:1356–1368
  11. Wade WG, Jones G. The role of vision and spatial orientation in the maintenance of posture. Phys Ther. 1997;77:619–628
  12. Guerraz M, Sakellari V, Burchill P, Bronstein AM. Influence of motion parallax in the control of spontaneous body sway. Exp Brain Res. 2000;131:244–252
  13. Isotalo E, Kapoula Z, Feret P-H, Gauchon K, Samfirescu F, Gagey P-M. Monocular versus binocular vision in postural control. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2004;31:11–17
  14. Palmisano S. Perceiving self-motion in depth: the role of stereoscopic motion and changing-size cues. Percept Psychophys. 1996;58:1168–1176
  15. Kelly JW, Loomis JM, Beall AC. The importance of perceived relative motion in the control of posture. Exp Brain Res. 2005;161:285–292
  16. Lestienne F, Soechting J, Berthoz A. Postural readjustments induced by linear motion of visual scenes. Exp Brain Res. 1977;28:363–384
  17. Winter DA. Biomechanics and motor control of human movement. New York: Wiley; 1990;
  18. Peterka RJ, Loughlin PJ. Dynamic regulation of sensorimotor integration in human postural control. J Neurophysiol. 2004;91:410–423
  19. Allum JH, Zamani F, Adkin AL, Ernst A. Differences between trunk sway characteristics on a foam support surface and on the Equitest ankle-sway-referenced support surface. Gait Posture. 2002;16:264–270
  20. Trimble MH, Koceja DM. Effect of a reduced base of support in standing and balance training on the soleus H-reflex. Int J Neurosci. 2001;106:1–20
  21. Dietz V. Proprioception and locomotor disorders. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002;3:781–790
  22. Warren WH, Kurtz KJ. The role of central and peripheral vision in perceiving the direction of self-motion. Percept Psychophys. 1992;51:443–454
  23. Andersen GJ, Braunstein ML. Induced self-motion in central vision. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1985;11:122–132
  24. Faubert J. Motion parallax, stereoscopy, and the perception of depth: practical and theoretical issues. Proc Int Soc Opt Eng. 2001;CR76:168–191
  25. Lord SR, Menz HB. Visual contributions to postural stability in older adults. Gerontology. 2000;46:306–310
  26. Isableu B, Ohlmann T, Crémieux J, Amblard B. Differential approach to strategies of segmental stabilisation in postural control. Exp Brain Res. 2003;150:208–221
  27. Kuno S, Kawakami O, Miyake Y, Watanabe S. Postural adjustment response to depth direction moving patterns produced by virtual reality graphics. Jpn J Physiol. 1999;49:417–424
  28. Sveistrup H. Motor rehabilitation using virtual reality. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2004;1:10
  29. Viau A, Feldman AG, McFadyen BJ, Levin MF. Reaching in reality and virtual reality: a comparison of movement kinematics in healthy subjects and in adults with hemiparesis. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2004;1:11
  30. Keshner EA. Virtual reality and physical rehabilitation: a new toy or a new research and rehabilitation tool?. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2004;1:8

PII: S0966-6362(06)00003-8

doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2005.12.013

Gait & Posture
Volume 25, Issue 1 , Pages 49-55 , January 2007

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution