Logo
Search for

Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages 25-32 (January 2007)


View previous. 7 of 26 View next.

Criterion validity of 3D trunk accelerations to assess external work and power in able-bodied gait

André MeichtryabCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Jacqueline Romkesc, Charles Gobeleta, Reinald Brunnerc, Roland Müllerd

Received 3 May 2005; received in revised form 19 December 2005; accepted 19 December 2005. published online 15 February 2006.

Abstract 

Evaluative quantification of gait disorder minimizing time-consuming and cost-intensive laboratory installations remains a challenging task in movement analysis. We examined the criterion validity of global gait mechanics assessed by trunk accelerometry. Eight female and four male volunteer subjects (mean age, 27.5 years; S.D., 5.1 years; weight, 68.7±11.3kg; height, 1.74±0.08m) without gait dysfunction participated in the study. They walked barefoot over two adjacent force-platforms at self-selected speeds. In addition to ground reaction forces, vertical, anterior–posterior and medio-lateral accelerations of the trunk were simultaneously measured by means of a light tri-axial accelerometer. Mean acceleration cycles of the trunk and the body centre of mass were calculated. Acceleration vectors were integrated twice to obtain velocity and displacement vectors of the trunk and the centre of mass, respectively. Temporal boundaries of right and left functional stance phases were defined by the two intermediate moments between maximum anterior–posterior velocity and minimal vertical displacement. Cross-correlations of the kinematics of the trunk and the centre of mass were determined. External work and corresponding symmetry indicators were computed for both methods. Centre of mass anterior–posterior displacement lagged behind the trunk by 3.5% of the gait cycle. External power correlated highly (r>0.82) between the trunk model and the centre of mass. Work correlated moderately high (r=0.77) between the two methods. Work and power asymmetry indexes correlated moderately high (r>0.64). Our findings suggest that accelerometry has the potential to assess functional kinematics and energy-related outcomes in large cohorts.

a Unit of Movement Analysis, Clinique romande de rédaptation, SUVA Care, Av. Gd. Champsec 90, 1950 Sion, Switzerland

b Physiotherapy Science Studies, Department of Rheumatology and Institute of Physical Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland and Faculty of Health Sciences, Maastricht University, The Netherlands

c Laboratory for Gait Analysis, Children's University Hospital (UKBB), Burgfelderstrasse 101, 4055 Basel, Switzerland

d Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, Forchstrasse 340, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +41 27 603 23 30; fax: +41 27 603 30 31.

PII: S0966-6362(06)00011-7

doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2005.12.016


View previous. 7 of 26 View next.