Elsevier

Gait & Posture

Volume 28, Issue 2, August 2008, Pages 278-284
Gait & Posture

Compensatory mechanism involving the knee joint of the intact limb during gait in unilateral below-knee amputees

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.12.073Get rights and content

Abstract

This study evaluated the asymmetry of knee kinetics during uncomfortable gait induced by prosthesis misalignment to further demonstrate the compensatory function of the knee joint of the intact limb during gait. Three-dimensional gait analysis including knee kinematics and kinetics at the beginning of stance phase was conducted in 15 healthy subjects and 17 unilateral trans-tibial amputees (TTA) walking at self-selected speed in three conditions of prosthetic alignment: initial alignment (IA); initial alignment altered either by 6° of internal rotation (IR) or by 6° of external rotation (ER) applied on the pylon. Patients reported best comfort of gait in IA condition and discomfort mainly in IR condition. Maximum knee flexion and knee total work at power phases K0–K2 were significantly higher in intact limbs compared to prosthetic and control limbs. In intact limbs, these variables had significantly higher values (+10–35%, p < 0.05) in IR condition than IA condition whereas these were not altered across conditions in prosthetic limbs. In trans-tibial amputees, inducing uncomfortable gait by internally rotating the prosthetic foot did not alter the knee kinetics of the prosthetic limb, which suggests a protective mechanism. Knee kinetics of the intact limb did alter, which suggests a compensatory mechanism.

Introduction

Unilateral trans-tibial amputees (TTA) are asymmetrical in their gait. They spend less time in stance on their prosthetic limb and more time on their intact limb [1], [2], [3]. They load their prosthetic limb less than their intact limb [1], [4], [5], [6], [7] and their intact limb more than able-bodied persons during natural cadence walking [8]. This reduction in both the load intensity and duration of the prosthetic limb during gait may be related to a protective motor strategy [9], [10] since the soft tissues of the amputated limb are not suitable for load-bearing [11]. At the beginning of stance, the knee extensor moment and related work during the power phases K1 and K2, which contribute to stability and shock absorption of the weight accepting limb [12], [13], are reduced in the prosthetic limb [1], [9], [14] and increased in the intact limb [15] compared to able-bodied persons. These knee kinetics patterns suggest a protective mechanism for the prosthetic limb. However, they also suggest a compensatory mechanism involving the intact limb and particularly the knee joint [15]. A compensatory mechanism can be demonstrated if the related deviations are further increased in response to more constraining conditions. Increased loading of the intact limb in response to higher walking speed in TTA further supported the presence of a compensatory mechanism [10]. However, loading asymmetry did not increase significantly after inducing a 10° of frontal or sagittal plane prosthetic misalignment in TTA [5]. Walking with prosthetic misalignment may be less demanding on lower limb dynamics than walking at high speed. Knee kinetics has not been tested in response to any prosthetic misalignment and may be more sensitive than the loading pattern.

In this study we assessed knee dynamic variables to demonstrate the compensatory function of the knee joint of the intact limb in response to prosthetic transverse plane misalignment. The foot progression angle, which is defined as the angle between the line of progression and the longitudinal axis of the foot, has been reported to influence knee dynamics during gait [16]. Therefore, the prosthetic foot transverse plane alignment was altered to induce ipsilateral discomfort. We hypothesized that uncomfortable gait induced by alteration of the prosthetic foot progression angle would be associated to an increase in knee total work at the beginning of stance phase, not on the prosthetic limb but on the intact limb, suggesting protective and compensatory mechanisms, respectively.

Section snippets

Subjects

The study was approved by the District Human Ethics Committee and informed consent was obtained from the 15 normal subjects and 17 patients. Patients with post-traumatic unilateral TTA were enrolled during a continuous period of time regardless of the type of their prosthesis (2 rigid feet (SACH) and 15 propulsive feet: 2 Multiflex ERF®, 1 Variflex®, 1 Sureflex®, 4 Flexwalk®, 2 C-Walk 1C40®, 2 Cadence HP® and 3 Reflex®). Patients wearing their prosthesis for more than 1 year were included. The

Gait comfort

Among the 17 patients: 14 reported the IR condition as clearly less comfortable (disagreeable, tiring or unsteady gait) than both IA and ER conditions and ER condition as equally comfortable (n = 7) or slightly less comfortable (n = 7) than IA condition; the remaining 3 patients reported the ER condition as less comfortable than IR condition which in turn was less comfortable than IA condition.

Foot progression angle

The foot progression angle in the prosthetic limbs group was significantly more internal (7°(8)) in IR

Discussion

Knee total work at the beginning of stance phase (K0–K2 phases) in IA condition was higher on the intact limbs compared to control limbs and lower in the prosthetic limbs compared to control limbs. In the IR uncomfortable condition, this knee variable was further increased for intact limbs compared to IA condition, whereas it did not change for prosthetic limbs. As hypothesized, these results suggest an important role of knee dynamics in the compensatory function of the intact limb in response

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the financial support of the French Health Ministry (PHRC grant # DGS 2005/0150) and of the Institut Regional de Readaptation de Nancy and thank Mrs. M.-A. Haldric for her technical assistance.
Conflict of interest

None.

References (27)

  • R.D. Snyder et al.

    The effect of five prosthetic feet on the gait and loading of the sound limb in dysvascular below-knee amputees

    J Rehabil Res Dev

    (1995)
  • M.S. Pinzur et al.

    The effect of prosthetic alignment on relative limb loading in persons with trans-tibial amputation: a preliminary report

    J Rehabil Res Dev

    (1995)
  • A.P. Arya et al.

    A biomechanical comparison of the Sach, Seattle and Jaipur feet using ground reaction forces

    Prosthet Orthot Int

    (1995)
  • Cited by (67)

    • Assessment of biomechanical deficits in individuals with a trans-tibial amputation during level gait using one-dimensional statistical parametric mapping

      2021, Gait and Posture
      Citation Excerpt :

      Specifically, TTA exhibit smaller step length [4], stance time [4,7], single limb support time [7] and peak knee flexion [3] for the AmLL compared to the InLL. These spatiotemporal and kinematic deficits modify joints loads for the AmLL as highlighted by smaller peak knee extension moment and angular impulse [3] and peak knee/hip abduction moments [5]. TTA also present a variety of spatiotemporal and biomechanical deficits for the AmLL compared CnLL such as a smaller stance time [8], stride length [6,8], peak knee flexion angle/moment [6], peak knee abduction moment [5], peak positive knee power [6], peak hip abduction moment [5] and greater swing time [8].

    • Effect of prosthetic alignment on gait and biomechanical loading in individuals with transfemoral amputation: A preliminary study

      2019, Gait and Posture
      Citation Excerpt :

      In addition, in most cases of alignment, the vertical impulse of the intact side was significantly larger than that of the control group, which perhaps further explained the higher injury rate on the intact side of individuals with lower-limb amputation than on the residual side. The results for the vertical GRF are consistent with those of previous studies on the individuals with transtibial amputation [19,21]. The results on effects of alignments showed that the alignment changes had no significant effect on spatiotemporal gait parameters but significantly affected GRF in individuals with transfemoral amputation.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text