Gait & Posture
Volume 28, Issue 3 , Pages 442-447, October 2008

The validity of an existing gait classification system when applied to a representative population of children with hemiplegia

  • Brona C. McDowell

      Affiliations

    • Gait Analysis Service, Musgrave Park Hospital, Belfast BT9 7JB, Ireland
    • Physiotherapy Department, Musgrave Park Hospital, Belfast BT9 7JB, Ireland
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Gait Analysis Laboratory, Musgrave Park Hospital, Stockman's Lane, Belfast BT9 7JB, Ireland. Tel.: +44 2890902556; fax: +44 2890368202.
  • ,
  • Claire Kerr

      Affiliations

    • Gait Analysis Service, Musgrave Park Hospital, Belfast BT9 7JB, Ireland
    • Physiotherapy Department, Musgrave Park Hospital, Belfast BT9 7JB, Ireland
    • Department of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen University Belfast, Ireland
  • ,
  • Connor Kelly

      Affiliations

    • Gait Analysis Service, Musgrave Park Hospital, Belfast BT9 7JB, Ireland
  • ,
  • Jose Salazar

      Affiliations

    • Gait Analysis Service, Musgrave Park Hospital, Belfast BT9 7JB, Ireland
  • ,
  • Aidan Cosgrove

      Affiliations

    • Gait Analysis Service, Musgrave Park Hospital, Belfast BT9 7JB, Ireland

Received 14 November 2007; received in revised form 12 February 2008; accepted 14 February 2008. published online 01 April 2008.

Abstract 

This study describes sagittal plane gait patterns in a representative sample of children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy (CP). Ninety-four children were prospectively recruited to the study (age range 5–18 yrs, mean age 10 yrs 7 mo) and valid kinematic data was captured for 91 participants. Data was also captured for 49 children (age range 5–18 yrs, mean age 10 yrs) with no physical impairment. One representative gait cycle from each child was exported to an Excel template and run through an algorithm that facilitated the description of gait, using logical arguments derived from Winters’ Classification. Children with hemiplegic CP, regardless of past surgery history, were allocated to the following gait types: Groups IV (n=9; 10%), III (n=7: 8%), II (n=5: 5%), I (n=32: 35%) and not classified (n=38: 42%). For children with no lower limb surgical history (n=61), gait types were: Groups IV (n=7: 12%), III (n=2: 3%), II (n=2: 3%), I (n=20: 33%) and not classified (n=30: 49%). The gait data taken from children with no physical impairment were not classified. The ability of the Winters’ classification system to distinguish between children with higher levels of hemiplegic involvement and children with no physical impairment was demonstrated: the majority of children with hemiplegic CP present with relatively minor gait deviations. A more complete definition of sagittal plane ankle joint kinematics may account for those children that were not classified.

Keywords: Cerebral palsy, Hemiplegia, Gait, Winters classification

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Funded by the Northern Ireland Research and Development Office, Project Grant RSG/1708/01.

PII: S0966-6362(08)00060-X

doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.02.003

Gait & Posture
Volume 28, Issue 3 , Pages 442-447, October 2008