Logo
Search for

Volume 30, Issue 4, Pages 459-463 (November 2009)


View previous. 13 of 35 View next.

Reliability of the new freezing of gait questionnaire: Agreement between patients with Parkinson's disease and their carers

Alice NieuwboeraCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Lynn Rochesterb, Talia Hermanc, Wim Vandenberghed, George Ehab Emila, Tom Thomaesa, Nir Giladic

Received 4 February 2009; received in revised form 19 June 2009; accepted 2 July 2009. published online 06 August 2009.

Abstract 

Freezing of gait (FOG) is difficult to measure due to its unpredictable occurrence. This study investigated: (1) whether the new freezing of gait questionnaire (NFOG-Q) is a reliable measure of freezing by comparing patients’ ratings with those of carers’ and (2) whether adding a video improved its reliability. Non-demented people with Parkinson's disease (PD) (N=102) and their carers of similar age and cognitive status were recruited from movement disorders clinics in three countries. The NFOG-Q was administered to carers and patients independently before and after watching a video showing several examples of FOG. Patients had very high agreement between their pre- and post-video detection of FOG (Kappa=0.91). However, this was less than in carers (Kappa=0.79). The video had a significant influence (p=0.01) on the rating of FOG severity (duration) but not on the estimation of its functional impact. Post-video freezing severity scores in the 69 freezers showed high agreement with carers’ scores (ICC=0.78 [0.65;0.87]). We conclude that the NFOG-Q is a reliable tool to detect and evaluate the impact and severity of FOG. Adding a video does not add to the sensitivity and specificity of FOG detection but influences the estimation of FOG severity.

a Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit, Leuven, Belgium

b Institute for Ageing and Health, Clinical Ageing Research Unit, Newcastle University, United Kingdom

c Movement Disorders Unit, Parkinson Center, Sourasky Medical Centre Tel-Aviv, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel

d Department of Neurosciences, Katholieke Universiteit, Leuven, Belgium

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Kinesiology and Rehabilitation Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Tervuursevest 101, 3001 Heverlee, Belgium. Tel.: +32 16 32 9119; fax: +32 16 32 9197.

PII: S0966-6362(09)00200-8

doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.07.108


View previous. 13 of 35 View next.