Gait & Posture
Volume 31, Issue 1 , Pages 104-108 , January 2010

A comparison of multi-segment foot kinematics during level overground and treadmill walking

Received 26 February 2009 ,Revised 21 August 2009 ,Accepted 12 September 2009.

References 

  1. Orendurff MS, Schoen JA, Bernatz GC, Crass SM, Klute GK. How humans walk: bout duration, steps per bout and rest duration. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2009;45:1077–1090
  2. Glaister BC, Bernatz GC, Klute GK, Orendurff MS. Video task analysis of turning during activities of daily living. Gait Posture. 2007;25:289–294
  3. Dingwll J, Cusumano J, Cavanaugh P, Sternad D. Local dynamic stability versus kinematic variability of continuous overground and treadmill walking. J Biomech Eng. 2001;123(1):27
  4. Alton F, Baldey L, Caplan S, Morrissey MC. A kinematic comparison of overground and treadmill walking. J Biomech. 1998;13:434–440
  5. Murray MP, Spurr GB, Sepic SB, Gardner GM, Mollinger LA. Treadmill vs. floor walking: kinematics, electromyogram, and heart rate. J Appl Physiol. 1985;59(1):87–91
  6. Riley PO, Paolini G, Della Croce U, Paylo KW, Kerrigan DC. A kinematic and kinetic comparison of overground and treadmill walking in healthy subjects. Gait Posture. 2007;26(1):17–24
  7. Benedetti MG, Leardini A, Bianchi L, Berti L, Giannini S. Comparisons of outputs of different models for foot kinematics. In: Proceedings of the international foot and ankle biomechanics congress. 2008;p. 91
  8. Canseco K, Long J, Marks R, Khazzam M, Harris GF. Quantitative characterization of gait kinematics in patients with hallux rigidus using the Milwaukee Foot Model. J Ortho Res. 2008;26:419–427
  9. Flemister AS, Neville CG, Houck J. The relationship between ankle, hindfoot, and forefoot position and posterior tibial muscle excursion. Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28(4):448–455
  10. Huang UC, Harbst K, Kotajarvi B, Hansen D, Koff M, Kitaoka H, et al. Effects of ankle-foot orthoses on ankle and foot kinematics in patient with ankle osteoarthritis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87:710–716
  11. Hunt AE, Smith RM. Mechanics and control of the flat versus normal foot during the stance phase of walking. Clin Biomech. 2004;19:391–397
  12. Khazzam M, Long JT, Marks RM, Harris GF. Kinematic changes of the foot and ankle in patients with systemic rheumatoid arthritis and forefoot deformity. J Ortho Res. 2007;25:319–329
  13. Levinger P, Gilleard W. Tibia and rearfoot motion and ground reaction forces in subjects with patellofemoral pain syndrome during walking. Gait Posture. 2007;25(1):2–8
  14. Neville C, Flemister A, Tome J, Houck J. Comparison of changes in posterior tibialis muscle length between subjects with posterior tibial tendon dysfunction and healthy controls during walking. JOSPT. 2007;37(11):661–669
  15. Ness ME, Long J, Marks R, Harris G. Foot and ankle kinematics in patients with posterior tibial tendon dysfunction. Gait Posture. 2008;27:331–339
  16. Rattanaprasert U, Smith R, Sullivan M, Gilleard W. Three-dimensional kinematics of the forefoot, rearfoot and leg with the function of tibialis posterior in comparison with normals during stance phase of walking. Clin Biomech. 1999;14:14–23
  17. Ringleb SI, Karvos SJ, Kotajarvi BR, Hansen DK, Kitaoka HB, Kaufman KR. Changes in gait associated with acute stage II posterior tibial tendon dysfunction. Gait Posture. 2007;25:555–564
  18. Theologis TN, Harrington ME, Thompson N, Benson KD. Dynamic foot movement in children treated for congenital talipes equinovarus. JBJS [Br]. 2003;85-B:572–577
  19. Tome J, Nawoczenski DA, Flemister A, Houck J. Comparison of foot kinematics between subjects with posterior tibialis tendon dysfunction and healthy controls. JOSPT. 2006;36(9):635–644
  20. Woodburn J, Nelson KM, Siegel KL, Kepple TM, Gerber LH. Multisegment foot motion during gait: proof of concept in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumat. 2004;31(10):1918–1927
  21. Wu WL, Su FC, Cheng YM, Huang PJ, Chou YL, Chou CK. Gait analysis after ankle arthrodesis. Gait Posture. 2000;11:54–61
  22. Rao S, Saltzman C, Yack HJ. Segmental foot mobility in individuals with and without diabetes and neuropathy. Clin Biomech. 2007;22:464–471
  23. Tulchin K, Orendurff M, Adolfsen S, Karol L. Effects of speed on multi-segment foot kinematics. J Appl Biomech, in press.
  24. Davis RB, Ounpuu S, Tyburski D, Gage JR. A gait analysis data collection and reduction technique. Hum Mov Sci. 1991;10(5):575–587
  25. Tulchin K, Haideri N. Utility of a multi-segment foot model. In: Proceedings of the 8th international symposium on the 3D analysis of human movement. 2004;p. 25–28
  26. Woltring HJ. A FORTAN package for generalized cross-validatory spline smoothing and differentiation. Adv Eng Software. 1986;8(2):104–113
  27. Perry J. Gait analysis; normal and pathological function. Thorofare, NJ: Slack; 1992;
  28. Wervey R, Schwartz M. A new device for improving foot marker alignment. In: Proceedings of the 8th annual GCMAS meeting. 2003;
  29. Matsas A, Taylor N, McBurney H. Knee joint kinematics from familiarized treadmill walking can be generalized to overground walking in young unimpaired subjects. Gait Posture. 2000;11(1):72–79

PII: S0966-6362(09)00620-1

doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.09.007

Gait & Posture
Volume 31, Issue 1 , Pages 104-108 , January 2010

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution