Gait & Posture
Volume 31, Issue 2 , Pages 175-179, February 2010

Meaningful change in measures of gait variability in older adults

  • Jennifer S. Brach

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: 6035 Forbes Tower, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, United States. Tel.: +1 412 383 6533; fax: +1 412 648 5970.
  • ,
  • Subashan Perera

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
  • ,
  • Stephanie Studenski

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
  • ,
  • Mindy Katz

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, United States
  • ,
  • Charles Hall

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, United States
    • Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, United States
  • ,
  • Joe Verghese

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, United States

Received 2 February 2009; received in revised form 29 September 2009; accepted 3 October 2009. published online 04 November 2009.

Abstract 

Objectives

Gait variability is an important indicator of impaired mobility in older adults; however, little is known about the meaning of change in gait variability over time. This study estimated clinically meaningful change in measures of gait variability using both distribution- and anchor-based approaches.

Design

Community-based observational cohort study.

Setting

Bronx County and the research center at Albert Einstein College of Medicine.

Participants

Of 1148 participants in the Einstein Aging Study, 241 had quantitative gait assessments in two consecutive years between 2001 and 2005.

Measurements

Gait variables were collected using a 12-foot instrumented walkway as participants walked at their normal walking speed. Gait variability was defined as the within-person standard deviation (SD) across steps in two 12-foot walks. Distribution-based meaningful change estimates used Cohen's effect size (0.2 for small and 0.5 for moderate effects). Anchor-based estimates were obtained using dichotomous and ordinal self-reported walking ability ratings as anchors.

Results

Distribution-based estimates for small and substantial changes of variability measures were: stance time 0.005 and 0.014s; swing time 0.003 and 0.009s; step length 0.24 and 0.61cm; and step width 0.03 and 0.08cm. Among those reporting no change in walking ability, measures of gait variability were stable over 1 year. Among those reporting a decline in walking, stance time and swing time variability increased. Among those reporting an improvement in walking, only step length variability improved.

Conclusion

Preliminary criteria for meaningful change are 0.01s for stance time and swing time variability and 0.25cm for step length variability. These estimates may identify important changes over time in both clinical settings and research studies.

Keywords: Gait speed, Gait variability, Meaningful change, Aging

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Funding sources and related paper presentations: The Einstein Aging Study is supported by National Institutes on Aging program project grant (AG03949). J. Verghese is supported by a National Institutes on Aging grant (R01 AG025119). University of Pittsburgh Older American's Independence Center grant P30 AG024827-01. J.S. Brach is supported by a National Institutes on Aging and American Federation of Aging Research Paul Beeson Career Development Award (K23 AG026766).

PII: S0966-6362(09)00635-3

doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.10.002

Gait & Posture
Volume 31, Issue 2 , Pages 175-179, February 2010