Gait & Posture
Volume 31, Issue 2 , Pages 185-190, February 2010

Speeding up gait initiation and gait-pattern with a startling stimulus

  • Ana Queralt

      Affiliations

    • Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
    • Universitat de València, Valencia, Spain
  • ,
  • Josep Valls-Solé

      Affiliations

    • Unitat d’EMG, Servei de Neurologia, Hospital Clínic, Universitat de Barcelona, IDIBAPS (Institut d’Investigació Biomèdica August Pi i Sunyer), Barcelona, Spain
    • Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas (CIBERNED), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
  • ,
  • Juan M. Castellote

      Affiliations

    • Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
    • Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, C/Ciudad Universitaria s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain. Tel.: +34 913941518.

Received 9 October 2008; received in revised form 23 September 2009; accepted 7 October 2009. published online 16 November 2009.

Abstract 

Human gait involves a repetitive leg motor pattern that emerges after gait initiation. While the automatic maintenance of the gait-pattern may be under the control of subcortical motor centres, gait initiation requires the voluntary launching of a different motor program. In this study, we sought to examine how the two motor programmes respond to an experimental manipulation of the timing of gait initiation. Subjects were instructed to start walking as soon as possible at the perception of an imperative signal (IS) that, in some interspersed trials was accompanied by a startling auditory stimulus (SAS). This method is known to shorten the latency for execution of the motor task under preparation. We reasoned that, if the two motor programmes were launched together, the gait-pattern sequence would respond to SAS in the same way as gait initiation. We recorded the gait phases and the electromyographic (EMG) activity of four muscles from the leg that initiates gait. In trials with SAS, latency of all gait initiation-related events showed a significant shortening and the bursts of EMG activity had higher amplitude and shorter duration than in trials without SAS. The events related to gait-pattern were also advanced but otherwise unchanged. The fact that all the effects of SAS were limited to gait initiation suggests that startle selectively can affect the neural structures involved in gait initiation. Additionally, the proportional advancement of the gait-pattern sequence to the end of gait initiation supports the view that gait initiation may actually trigger the inputs necessary for generating the gait-pattern sequence.

Keywords: Central pattern generator, Kinematics, Gait, Startle, Subcortical motor circuits

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0966-6362(09)00636-5

doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.10.003

Gait & Posture
Volume 31, Issue 2 , Pages 185-190, February 2010