Logo
Search for

Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages 218-222 (February 2010)


View previous. 16 of 31 View next.

Sagittal plane bending moments acting on the lower leg during running

Affendi Haris Phuahab, Anthony G. Schachec, Kay M. Crossleycde, Tim V. Wrigleya, Mark W. CreabyaCorresponding Author Informationemail address

Received 16 April 2009; received in revised form 19 October 2009; accepted 19 October 2009. published online 18 November 2009.

Abstract 

Sagittal bending moments acting on the lower leg during running may play a role in tibial stress fracture development. The purpose of this study was to evaluate these moments at nine equidistant points along the length of the lower leg (10% point–90% point) during running. Kinematic and ground reaction force data were collected for 20 male runners, who each performed 10 running trials. Inverse dynamics and musculoskeletal modelling techniques were used to estimate sagittal bending moments due to reaction forces and muscle contraction. The muscle moment was typically positive during stance, except at the most proximal location (10% point) on the lower leg. The reaction moment was predominantly negative throughout stance and greater in magnitude than the muscle moment. Hence, the net sagittal bending moment acting on the lower leg was principally negative (indicating tensile loads on the posterior tibia). Peak moments typically occurred around mid-stance, and were greater in magnitude at the distal, compared with proximal, lower leg. For example, the peak reaction moment at the most distal point was −9.61±2.07%Bw.Ht., and −2.73±1.18%Bw.Ht. at the most proximal point. These data suggest that tensile loads on the posterior tibia are likely to be higher toward the distal end of the bone. This finding may explain the higher incidence of stress fracture in the distal aspect of the tibia, observed by some authors. Stress fracture susceptibility will also be influenced by bone strength and this should also be accounted for in future studies.

a Centre for Health, Exercise & Sports Medicine, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

b School of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

c Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

d Physiotherapy, Melbourne School of Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

e National ICT Australia, Victorian Research Laboratory, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +61 03 8344 4171; fax: +61 03 8344 4188.

PII: S0966-6362(09)00644-4

doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.10.009


View previous. 16 of 31 View next.