Gait & Posture
Volume 31, Issue 3 , Pages 300-306, March 2010

The use of kinematic and parametric information to highlight lack of movement and compensation in the upper extremities during activities of daily living

  • Alessio Murgia

      Affiliations

    • School of Systems Engineering, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading, RG6 6AY, United Kingdom
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +44 (0) 118 378 5225.
  • ,
  • Peter Kyberd

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, Canada, E3B 5A3
  • ,
  • Tom Barnhill

      Affiliations

    • Fredericton Medical Clinic, 1015 Regent Street, Fredericton, NB, Canada

Received 23 March 2009; received in revised form 9 September 2009; accepted 8 November 2009. published online 25 December 2009.

Abstract 

A problem that is common to the study of upper limb kinematics and gait analysis is the translation of the evidence from kinematic measurements into easily interpretable information on the status of the patient, such as the amount of compensation or lack of motion. In this study parameters that can be helpful in the rapid and clear identification of limited wrist motion and compensation were derived from kinematic data. A group of six subjects (group A) with no hand impairment, average age 32.5ys SD 10.7ys, and another group of five subjects (group B), average age 34.2ys SD 16.8ys, having suffered from distal radius fracture were tested during a cyclic activity of daily living. The activity simulated page turning. Thorax, shoulder, elbow and wrist angles were measured during this task using a motion capture system. Corresponding angle ranges were also calculated.

The active range of motion (AROM) found for Group B was generally lower than that of Group A, particularly for elbow supination and wrist movements, with wrist flexion/extension statistically smaller for group B (P=0.02). Additional parameters that took into account lack of movements at the wrist and compensation from shoulder elevation, rotation and elbow pronation/supination proved to be more useful at identifying those subjects of group B outside the normative range and can provide clinicians with a rapid and efficient tool that can shorten the analysis process and help make more informed decisions on therapeutic treatments.

Keywords: Upper limb kinematics, Compensatory movements, Activities of daily living, Distal radius fracture

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0966-6362(09)00659-6

doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.11.007

Gait & Posture
Volume 31, Issue 3 , Pages 300-306, March 2010