Differences in self-selected and fastest-comfortable walking in post-stroke hemiparetic persons
Received 7 May 2009; received in revised form 26 October 2009; accepted 16 November 2009. published online 14 December 2009.
Abstract
Post-stroke hemiparetic walking is typically asymmetric. Assessment of symmetry is often performed at either self-selected or fastest-comfortable walking speeds to gain insight into coordination deficits and compensatory mechanisms. However, how walking speed influences the level of asymmetry is unclear. This study analyzed relative changes in paretic and non-paretic leg symmetry to assess whether one speed is more effective at highlighting asymmetries in hemiparetic walking and whether there is a systematic effect of speed on asymmetry. Forty-six subjects with chronic hemiparesis walked at their self-selected and fastest-comfortable speeds on an instrumented split-belt treadmill. Relative proportions (paretic leg value/(paretic+non-paretic leg value)) were computed at each speed for step length (PSR), propulsion (PP), and joint moment impulses at the ankle and hip. Thirty-six subjects did not change their step length symmetry with speed, while three subjects changed their step length values toward increased asymmetry and seven changed toward increased symmetry. Propulsion symmetry did not change uniformly with speed for the group, with 15 subjects changing their propulsion values toward increased asymmetry while increasing speed from their self-selected to fastest-comfortable and 11 decreasing the asymmetry. Both step length and propulsion symmetry were correlated with ankle impulse proportion at self-selected and fastest-comfortable speed (cf., hip impulse proportion), but ratios (self-selected value/fastest-comfortable value) of the proportion measures (PSR and PP) showed that neither step length nor propulsion symmetry correlated with the ankle impulse proportions. Thus, the individual kinetic mechanisms used to increase speed could not be predicted from PSR or PP.
aDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Texas, Austin, TX, USA
bBrain Rehabilitation Research Center, Malcom Randall VA Medical Center, Gainesville, FL, USA
cDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
dBrooks Center for Rehabilitation Studies, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
Corresponding author at: Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station C2200, Austin, TX 78712, USA. Tel.: +1 512 471 0848; fax: +1 512 471 8727.