Gait & Posture
Volume 31, Issue 3 , Pages 336-340, March 2010

An empirical examination of detrended fluctuation analysis for gait data

Bloorview Research Institute, 150 Kilgour Road, Toronto, ON M4G 1R8, Canada

Received 20 June 2009; received in revised form 2 December 2009; accepted 10 December 2009. published online 08 January 2010.

Abstract 

Stride interval series exhibit statistical persistence, and detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA) is a routinely employed technique for describing this behavior. However, the implementation of DFA to gait data varies considerably between studies. We empirically examine two practical aspects of DFA which significantly affect the analysis outcome: the box size range and the stride interval series length. We conduct an analysis of their effect using stride intervals from 16 able-bodied adults, for overground walking, treadmill walking while holding a handrail, and treadmill walking without using a handrail. Our goal is to provide general guidelines for these two choices, with the aim of standardizing the application of DFA and facilitating inter-study comparisons. Based on the results of our analysis, we propose the use of box sizes from to , where N is the number of stride intervals. Moreover, for differentiating between normal and pathological walking with reasonable accuracy, we recommend a minimum of stride intervals.

Keywords: Stride interval dynamics, Detrended fluctuation analysis, Scaling exponent, Estimation, Sample size, Box size fitting range

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0966-6362(09)00683-3

doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.12.002

Gait & Posture
Volume 31, Issue 3 , Pages 336-340, March 2010