Gait & Posture
Volume 31, Issue 4 , Pages 420-428 , April 2010

Overground vs. treadmill walk-to-run transition

  • I. Van Caekenberghe

      Affiliations

    • These authors contributed equally to this work.
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +32 9 264 63 12; fax: +32 9 264 64 84.
  • ,
  • K. De Smet

      Affiliations

    • These authors contributed equally to this work.
    • Tel.: +32 9 264 63 12; fax: +32 9 264 64 84.
  • ,
  • V. Segers

      Affiliations

    • Tel.: +32 9 264 63 12; fax: +32 9 264 64 84.
  • ,
  • D. De Clercq

      Affiliations

    • Tel.: +32 9 264 63 22; fax: +32 9 264 64 84.

Received 7 May 2009 ,Revised 14 January 2010 ,Accepted 19 January 2010.

References 

  1. Nishikawa K. Neuromechanics: an integrative approach for understanding motor control. Integr Comp Biol. 2007;47:16
  2. Farley CT, Ferris DP. Biomechanics of walking and running: center of mass movements to muscle action. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 1998;26:253–285
  3. Hanna A, Abernethy B, Neal RJ, Burgess-Limerick R. Triggers for the transition between human walking and running. In:  Sparrow WA editors. Energetics of human activity. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2000;p. 124–164
  4. De Smet K, Malcolm P, Lenoir M, Segers V, De Clercq D. Effects of optic flow on spontaneous overground walk-to-run transition. Exp Brain Res. 2008;193:501–508
  5. De Smet K, Segers V, Lenoir M, De Clercq D. Spatiotemporal characteristics of spontaneous overground walk-to-run. Gait Posture. 2009;29:54–58
  6. Segers V, Aerts P, Lenoir M, De Clercq D. Spatiotemporal characteristics of the walk-to-run and run-to-walk transition when gradually changing speed. Gait Posture. 2006;24:247–254
  7. Segers V, Lenoir M, Aerts P, De Clercq D. Kinematics of the transition between walking and running when gradually changing speed. Gait Posture. 2007;26:349–361
  8. Li L. Stability landscapes of walking and running near gait transition speed. J Appl Biomech. 2000;16:428–435
  9. Van Caekenberghe I, Segers V, De Smet K, Aerts P, De Clercq D. Influence of treadmill acceleration on actual walk-to-run transition. Gait Posture. 2009;31:52–56
  10. van Ingen Schenau GGJ. Some fundamental aspects of the biomechanics of overground versus treadmill locomotion. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1980;12:257–261
  11. Christensen RR, Hollerbach JM, Xu Y, Meek SG. Inertial-force feedback for the treadport locomotion interface. Presence. 2000;9:1–14
  12. Malcolm P, Lenoir M, Aerts P, Segers V, De Clercq D. Treadmill versus overground run to walk and walk to run transition speed in unsteady state locomotion conditions. In: Proceedings of International Society of Biomechanics XXth Congress. 2005;
  13. Matsas A, Taylor N, McBurney H. Knee joint kinematics from familiarised treadmill walking can be generalised to overground walking in young unimpaired subjects. Gait Posture. 2000;11:46–53
  14. Lavcanska V, Taylor NF, Schache AG. Familiarization to treadmill running in young unimpaired adults. Hum Mov Sci. 2005;24:544–557
  15. Diedrich FJ, Warren JWH. Why change gaits? Dynamics of the walk-run transition. J Exp Psychol Human. 1995;21:183–203
  16. Winter DA. The biomechanics and motor control of human gait: normal, elderly and pathological. 2 ed.. Waterloo: Waterloo Biomechanics; 1991;

PII: S0966-6362(10)00026-3

doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.01.011

Gait & Posture
Volume 31, Issue 4 , Pages 420-428 , April 2010