Gait & Posture
Volume 32, Issue 1 , Pages 1-5, May 2010

Kinematic differences between normal and low arched feet in children using the Heidelberg foot measurement method

  • D. Twomey

      Affiliations

    • School of Safety Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales 2052, Australia
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.
  • ,
  • A.S. McIntosh

      Affiliations

    • School of Safety Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales 2052, Australia
  • ,
  • J. Simon

      Affiliations

    • Interdisciplinary Centre for Scientific Computation, Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 368, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
    • Department of Orthopedics, University of Heidelberg, Schlierbacher Landstrasse 200a, 69118 Heidelberg, Germany
  • ,
  • K. Lowe

      Affiliations

    • Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales 2031, Australia
  • ,
  • S.I. Wolf

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopedics, University of Heidelberg, Schlierbacher Landstrasse 200a, 69118 Heidelberg, Germany

Received 28 July 2008; received in revised form 25 January 2010; accepted 25 January 2010. published online 22 February 2010.

Abstract 

The purpose of this study was to investigate the kinematics of normal arched and low arched feet in children and use this data to quantify the differences between the two foot types during walking gait. Multi-segment foot motion was measured, using the Heidelberg foot measurement method (HFMM), for 25 normal arched feet and 27 low arched feet in 9–12-year-old children. The kinematic differences in the foot between the two groups during walking were relatively small, except for the medial arch and forefoot supination angles. The magnitude of the medial arch angle was approximately 10° greater in the low arched group than the normal arched group throughout the gait cycle. There was a significant difference found in the forefoot supination angle (p<0.03), relative to the midfoot, between the two groups at initial heel strike, and maximum and minimum values throughout the gait cycle. The values for the normal group were significantly higher in all these angles indicating that the forefoot of the low arched foot remains less pronated during the gait cycle. There was no significant difference in the motion of the rearfoot between the two foot types. The results of this study provide normative values for children's feet and highlight the mechanical differences in flexible flat feet in this age group. This data contributes to knowledge on foot kinematics in children and will be valuable for future research on the structure, function and potential treatment of the flexible flat foot.

Keywords: Foot kinematics, Low arched feet, Children

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0966-6362(10)00036-6

doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.01.021

Gait & Posture
Volume 32, Issue 1 , Pages 1-5, May 2010