Gait & Posture
Volume 31, Issue 4 , Pages 461-464 , April 2010

Variation in trunk kinematics influences variation in step width during treadmill walking by older and younger adults

  • Christopher P. Hurt

      Affiliations

    • Department of Kinesiology and Nutrition, University of Illinois at Chicago, United States
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Department of Kinesiology and Nutrition (MC 994), University of Illinois at Chicago, 1919 W. Taylor Street, Room 654, Chicago, IL 60612, United States. Tel.: +1 312 996 9432; fax: +1 312 413 0319.
  • ,
  • Noah Rosenblatt

      Affiliations

    • Department of Kinesiology and Nutrition, University of Illinois at Chicago, United States
  • ,
  • Jeremy R. Crenshaw

      Affiliations

    • Department of Kinesiology and Nutrition, University of Illinois at Chicago, United States
  • ,
  • Mark D. Grabiner

      Affiliations

    • Department of Kinesiology and Nutrition, University of Illinois at Chicago, United States
    • Department of Bioengineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, United States

Received 15 December 2008 ,Revised 18 January 2010 ,Accepted 1 February 2010.

References 

  1. Bauby CE, Kuo AD. Active control of lateral balance in human walking. J Biomech. 2000;33(11):1433–1440
  2. Kuo AD. Stabilization of lateral motion in passive dynamic walking. Int J Robot Res. 1999;18:917–930
  3. Patla AE, Prentice SD, Rietdyk S, Allard F, Martin C. What guides the selection of alternate foot placement during locomotion in humans. Exp Brain Res. 1999;128(4):441–450
  4. Redfern MS, Schumann T. A model of foot placement during gait. J Biomech. 1994;27(11):1339–1346
  5. Schrager MA, Kelly VE, Price R, Ferrucci L, Shumway-Cook A. The effects of age on medio-lateral stability during normal and narrow base walking. Gait Posture. 2008;28(3):466–471
  6. Murray MP, Kory RC, Clarkson BH. Walking patterns in healthy old men. J Gerontol. 1969;24(2):169–178
  7. Owings TM, Grabiner MD. Step width variability, but not step length variability or step time variability, discriminates gait of healthy young and older adults during treadmill locomotion. J Biomech. 2004;37(6):935–938
  8. Grabiner MD, Troy KL. Attention demanding tasks during treadmill walking reduce step width variability in young adults. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2005;2:25
  9. Yack HJ, Berger RC. Dynamic stability in the elderly: identifying a possible measure. J Gerontol. 1993;48(5):M225–M230
  10. Menz HB, Lord SR, Fitzpatrick RC. Age-related differences in walking stability. Age Ageing. 2003;32(2):137–142
  11. Moe-Nilssen R, Helbostad JL. Interstride trunk acceleration variability but not step width variability can differentiate between fit and frail older adults. Gait Posture. 2005;21(2):164–170
  12. Donelan JM, Shipman DW, Kram R, Kuo AD. Mechanical and metabolic requirements for active lateral stabilization in human walking. J Biomech. 2004;37(6):827–835
  13. Lord SR, Lloyd DG, Li SK. Sensori-motor function, gait patterns and falls in community-dwelling women. Age Ageing. 1996;25(4):292–299
  14. Winter DA. Biomechanics and motor control of human movement. 3rd ed.. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2005;
  15. Kleinbaum D, Kupper L, Nizam A, Muller K. Applied regression analysis and other multivariable methods. Belmont: Thomson; 2008;
  16. Potthoff R. Johnson–Neyman technique. In:  Koltz S,  Johson NL editor. Encyclopedia of statistical sciences. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 1983;p. 299–303
  17. Sadeghi H, Allard P, Prince F, Labelle H. Symmetry and limb dominance in able-bodied gait: a review. Gait Posture. 2000;12(1):34–45
  18. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988;
  19. Winter DA. A.B.C. of balance during standing and walking. Waterloo: Waterloo Biomechanics; 1995;
  20. Hasson CJ, Van Emmerik RE, Caldwell GE. Predicting dynamic postural instability using center of mass time-to-contact information. J Biomech. 2008;41(10):2121–2129
  21. MacKinnon CD, Winter DA. Control of whole body balance in the frontal plane during human walking. J Biomech. 1993;26(6):633–644
  22. Sparrow WA, Begg RK, Parker S. Variability in the foot-ground clearance and step timing of young and older men during single-task and dual-task treadmill walking. Gait Posture. 2008;28(4):563–567
  23. Strike SC, Taylor MJ. The temporal-spatial and ground reaction impulses of turning gait: is turning symmetrical?. Gait Posture. 2009;29(4):597–602
  24. Kuhtz-Buschbeck JP, Brockmann K, Gilster R, Koch A, Stolze H. Asymmetry of arm-swing not related to handedness. Gait Posture. 2008;27(3):447–454
  25. Giakas GB, Baltzopoulos V. Time and frequency domain analysis of ground reaction forces during walking: an investigation of variability and symmetry. Gait Posture. 1997;5:189–197
  26. Orendurff MS, Segal AD, Klute GK, Berge JS, Rohr ES, Kadel NJ. The effect of walking speed on center of mass displacement. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2004;41(6A):829–834
  27. Lee SJ, Hidler J. Biomechanics of overground vs. treadmill walking in healthy individuals. J Appl Physiol. 2008;104(3):747–755
  28. Riley PO, Paolini G, Della Croce U, Paylo KW, Kerrigan DC. A kinematic and kinetic comparison of overground and treadmill walking in healthy subjects. Gait Posture. 2007;26(1):17–24
  29. Rosenblatt NG, Grabiner MD. Measures of frontal plane stability during treadmill and overground walking. Gait Posture; doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.01.002.
  30. Owings TM, Grabiner MD. Measuring step kinematic variability on an instrumented treadmill: how many steps are enough?. J Biomech. 2003;36(8):1215–1218

PII: S0966-6362(10)00039-1

doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.02.001

Gait & Posture
Volume 31, Issue 4 , Pages 461-464 , April 2010