Gait & Posture
Volume 31, Issue 4 , Pages 473-478, April 2010

Utilized friction when entering and exiting a dry and wet bathtub

  • Gunter P. Siegmund

      Affiliations

    • MEA Forensic Engineers & Scientists, 11-11151 Horseshoe Way, Richmond, BC, Canada V7A 4S5
    • School of Human Kinetics, University of British Columbia, 210-6081 University Blvd., Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z1
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: MEA Forensic Engineers & Scientists, 11-11151 Horseshoe Way, Richmond, BC, Canada V7A 4S5. Tel.: +1 604 277 3040; fax: +1 604 277 3020.
  • ,
  • Jim Flynn

      Affiliations

    • J2 Engineering Inc., 7636 N. Ingram, Suite 108, Fresno, CA 93711, USA
    • Tel.: +1 559 437 3884.
  • ,
  • Daniel W. Mang

      Affiliations

    • School of Human Kinetics, University of British Columbia, 210-6081 University Blvd., Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z1
    • Tel.: +1 604 822 3838.
  • ,
  • Dennis D. Chimich

      Affiliations

    • MEA Forensic Engineers & Scientists, 11-11151 Horseshoe Way, Richmond, BC, Canada V7A 4S5
    • Tel.: +1 604 277 3040.
  • ,
  • John C. Gardiner

      Affiliations

    • MEA Forensic Engineers & Scientists, 23281 Vista Grande Dr., Suite A, Laguna Hills, CA 92653, USA
    • Tel.: +1 949 855 4632.

Received 7 May 2009; received in revised form 20 January 2010; accepted 1 February 2010. published online 26 February 2010.

Abstract 

Bathtubs and showers are a common source of unintentional slips and falls. The goal of this study was to quantify the friction used by barefoot subjects entering and exiting a typical bathtub/shower enclosure under dry and wet conditions. Sixty subjects (30F, 30M) from three age groups (20–30 years, 40–50 years, 60–70 years) entered and exited a slip-resistant bathtub using six movement patterns (three entering and three exiting the tub) simulating actual use. Force plates installed in the tub floor and the slip-resistant deck outside the tub measured ground reaction forces, from which utilized friction and double support times were calculated. Overall, utilized friction varied from 0.102 to 0.442 (0.235±0.057) and was 0.058±0.040 lower in wet than dry conditions across all movement patterns (p<0.0001). During tub exiting movements, older subjects used less friction than young subjects (p<0.006). Utilized friction did not vary between genders (p>0.14). Double support times were longer in older subjects than in both young and middle-aged subjects for all movement patterns (p<0.0009) and longer under wet than dry conditions for all entry movements (p<0.0001). These data suggest that subjects regard the wet condition as more hazardous than the dry condition and adapt their utilized friction accordingly. These data also show that older subjects are more cautious than young subjects when confronted with the dual tasks of stepping over the tub's apron and transitioning to a surface perceived to be more slippery.

Keywords: Slip, Fall, Barefoot, Gender, Age, Surface condition

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0966-6362(10)00042-1

doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.02.003

Gait & Posture
Volume 31, Issue 4 , Pages 473-478, April 2010