Gait & Posture
Volume 31, Issue 4 , Pages 517-521, April 2010

Solutions for representing the whole-body centre of mass in side cutting manoeuvres based on data that is typically available for lower limb kinematics

Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Tom Reilly Building, Byrom Street Campus, Liverpool L3 3AF, UK

Received 3 September 2009; received in revised form 9 February 2010; accepted 18 February 2010. published online 18 March 2010.

Abstract 

While studying detailed lower limb mechanics of dynamic sports manoeuvres like side cutting it is often desirable but practically difficult to directly measure velocity profiles of the whole-body centre of mass (CoM). In the current study, representations of CoM, either based on a single marker placed on the pelvis or thorax, or based on segment kinematics of lower limbs with or without inclusion of trunk, were evaluated against whole-body CoM representation. Using the 95% limits of agreement method for comparison of two methods, strongest agreement was found between velocity of whole-body CoM and CoM representation based on lower limbs with the addition of the trunk. The CoM representation based on lower limbs only showed weaker agreement, but this representation was still markedly superior to single marker representations.

Keywords: 95% limits of agreement, Biomechanics, Centre of mass estimation

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0966-6362(10)00067-6

doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.02.014

Gait & Posture
Volume 31, Issue 4 , Pages 517-521, April 2010