Gait & Posture
Volume 32, Issue 1 , Pages 136-140, May 2010

Hamstring muscle forces prior to and immediately following an acute sprinting-related muscle strain injury

  • Anthony G. Schache

      Affiliations

    • Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +61 03 8344 6748; fax: +61 03 8344 4290.
  • ,
  • Hyung-Joo Kim

      Affiliations

    • Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia
  • ,
  • David L. Morgan

      Affiliations

    • Department of Electrical and Computer Systems Engineering, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia
  • ,
  • Marcus G. Pandy

      Affiliations

    • Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia

Received 3 September 2009; received in revised form 23 December 2009; accepted 7 March 2010. published online 15 April 2010.

Abstract 

A thorough understanding of the biomechanics of the hamstrings during sprinting is required to optimise injury rehabilitation and prevention strategies. The main aims of this study were to compare hamstrings load across different modes of locomotion as well as before and after an acute sprinting-related muscle strain injury. Bilateral kinematic and ground reaction force data were captured from a single subject whilst walking, jogging and sprinting prior to and immediately following a significant injury involving the right semitendinosis and biceps femoris long head muscles. Experimental data were input into a three-dimensional musculoskeletal model of the body and used, together with optimisation theory, to determine lower-limb muscle forces for each locomotor task. Hamstrings load was found to be greatest during terminal swing for sprinting. The hamstrings contributed the majority of the terminal swing hip extension and knee flexion torques, whilst gluteus maximus contributed most of the stance phase hip extension torque. Gastrocnemius contributed little to the terminal swing knee flexion torque. Peak hamstrings force was also substantially greater during terminal swing compared to stance for sprinting, but not for walking and jogging. Immediately following the muscle strain injury, the hamstrings demonstrated an intolerance to perform an eccentric-type contraction. Whilst peak hamstrings force during terminal swing did not decrease post-injury, both peak hamstrings length and negative work during terminal swing were considerably reduced. These results lend support to the paradigm that the hamstrings are most susceptible to muscle strain injury during the terminal swing phase of sprinting when they are contracting eccentrically.

Keywords: Musculoskeletal modelling, Muscle force, Eccentric contraction, Walking, Jogging, Sprinting

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0966-6362(10)00076-7

doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.03.006

Gait & Posture
Volume 32, Issue 1 , Pages 136-140, May 2010