Gait & Posture
Volume 32, Issue 2 , Pages 155-160, June 2010

On the role of knee joint in balance control and postural strategies: Effects of total knee replacement in elderly subjects with knee osteoarthritis

  • Gérome C. Gauchard

      Affiliations

    • Nancy-University, Henri Poincaré University, Balance Control and Motor Performance, UFR STAPS, Villers-lès-Nancy, France
    • INSERM U 954, Thematic group “Neurodegenerative Diseases, Neuroplasticity, Cognition”, Faculty of Medicine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France
  • ,
  • Guy Vançon

      Affiliations

    • Centre of Rehabilitation & Readaptation, “Centre Florentin”, OHS de Meurthe-et-Moselle, Nancy, France
  • ,
  • Philippe Meyer

      Affiliations

    • Centre of Rehabilitation & Readaptation “Centre Jacques Parisot”, OHS de Meurthe-et-Moselle, Bainville-sur-Madon, France
  • ,
  • Didier Mainard

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital of Nancy, Nancy, France
  • ,
  • Philippe P. Perrin

      Affiliations

    • Nancy-University, Henri Poincaré University, Balance Control and Motor Performance, UFR STAPS, Villers-lès-Nancy, France
    • INSERM U 954, Thematic group “Neurodegenerative Diseases, Neuroplasticity, Cognition”, Faculty of Medicine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France
    • Department of ENT, University Hospital of Nancy, Nancy, France
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Equilibration et Performance Motrice, Nancy Université, Université Henri Poincaré, Nancy 1, UFR STAPS, 30 rue du Jardin Botanique, 54 600 Villers-lès-Nancy, France. Tel.: +33 383 682 929; fax: +33 383 154 647.

Received 19 April 2009; received in revised form 7 January 2010; accepted 12 April 2010. published online 10 May 2010.

Abstract 

This study aimed to evaluate the role of the knee joint in the neurosensory organization of balance control and the generation of postural sensorimotor strategies. Ten patients, aged over 60 years and having undergone unilateral total knee replacement (TKR) for osteoarthritis, and 20 controls were submitted to static and dynamic posturographic tests and to a sensory organization test (SOT) aiming at evaluating postural control in quiet stance and during movement. The patients were submitted to these evaluations after the disappearance of pain (TKR1) and at the end of a 6-week rehabilitation program (TKR2). Balance control being greatly improved at TKR2 compared to TKR1, the patients attain a quality of postural regulation similar to that of the controls; some postural abnormalities did however persist for the static test. Moreover, SOT values at TKR2 close to those of the controls highlighted an improvement in motor response, better management in altered proprioceptive information situations, and greater use of the ankle to control balance. This model of intervention on the knee joint, namely knee replacement due to osteoarthritis, has shown that gradual functional sensorimotor restoration after TKR, due to intrasensory proprioceptive compensation either at knee, or at other joint levels (hip/ankle), improves dynamic balance control. This reacquisition allows the knee joint to recover its corrective compensatory role in postural regulation allowing, through neuroplasticity, the modification of muscular activation sequences and, thus, the implementation of anticipatory sensorimotor strategies.

Keywords: Postural control, Sensory organization, Knee osteoarthritis, Total knee replacement, Knee mechanics

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0966-6362(10)00108-6

doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.04.002

Gait & Posture
Volume 32, Issue 2 , Pages 155-160, June 2010