Gait & Posture
Volume 32, Issue 2 , Pages 181-184, June 2010

Effective rocker shapes used by able-bodied persons for walking and fore-aft swaying: Implications for design of ankle–foot prostheses

  • Andrew H. Hansen

      Affiliations

    • Minneapolis VA Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN, USA
    • Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: 1 Veterans Drive (151), Minneapolis, MN 55417, USA. Tel.: +1 612 467 2910; fax: +1 612 725 2093.
  • ,
  • Charles C. Wang

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biomedical Engineering, Northwestern University, McCormick School of Engineering and Applied Science, Evanston, IL, USA

Received 19 November 2009; received in revised form 9 April 2010; accepted 15 April 2010. published online 17 May 2010.

Abstract 

The use of rocker models to understand functional tasks of the human lower limb is attractive because of their simplicity. Recent studies have determined a consistent feature of able-bodied walking termed the roll-over shape (ROS), which is the effective rocker shape that the lower limb system conforms to between initial contact and contralateral initial contact during walking. However, it is unclear what effective rocker shapes are used for fore-aft swaying. A better understanding of these shapes could be used to develop improved prostheses for this task, perhaps improving balance and balance confidence, and reducing the occurrence of falling in lower limb prosthesis users. We measured effective rocker shapes used by 11 able-bodied persons during walking and fore-aft swaying. We hypothesized that the curvature of the swaying shapes would be smaller (radius larger) than that of the walking shapes, providing a more stable interface with the ground during swaying. The radius (measured as the inverse of the curvature of the shape) was found to be about 1/3 of the leg length for walking, but over two times the leg length for swaying. A model examining the effective ankle stiffness necessary to achieve these curvatures suggests that the stiffness of a biomimetic prosthetic ankle would need to be over three times higher for fore-aft swaying than for walking. These results suggest that two separate modes would be needed in an ankle–foot prosthesis to mimic the physiologic system for walking and swaying.

Keywords: Roll-over shape, Balance, Mobility, Prosthesis

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0966-6362(10)00120-7

doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.04.014

Gait & Posture
Volume 32, Issue 2 , Pages 181-184, June 2010