Gait & Posture
Volume 32, Issue 4 , Pages 530-535, October 2010

The effect of cane use method on center of mass displacement during stair ascent

  • Bih-Jen Hsue

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Therapy, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
  • ,
  • Fong-Chin Su

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, 1 University Road, Tainan 701, Taiwan. Tel.: +886 6 276 0665; fax: +886 6 234 3270.

Received 26 January 2010; received in revised form 18 June 2010; accepted 20 July 2010. published online 27 August 2010.

Abstract 

The aim of the study was to examine the effect of forward and lateral cane placement on displacement of whole body center of mass (COM) and spatial relationship between COM and the cane during stair ascent (SA) in healthy adults. The data were obtained using three-dimensional motion analysis while ascending stairs non-reciprocally with following methods: (1) dominant foot stepped up first, then the opposite foot without a cane (NC); (2) forward placement of a quadricane followed by the ipsilateral foot, then contralateral foot (FCI); (3) forward cane placement followed by the contralateral foot, then ipsilateral foot (FCC); (4) ipsilateral foot stepping up first, followed by the contralateral foot, then the cane (LCI); (5) contralateral foot stepping up, followed by the ipsilateral foot, then the cane (LCC). The results indicated that the cane placement had significant effect on the medial–lateral (ML) COM displacement and the kinematics of the trunk. Lateral cane placement requires greater trunk extension and side-flexion. The major differences between ipsilateral and contralateral cane use are the motions at frontal and transverse planes in which the COM displacement in ML direction is larger in ipsilateral cane use. The COM displacement in ML direction is larger in ipsilateral use of cane (LCI and FCI). The results of this study may help clinicians better understand the possible nature of balance control in patients who ascend stairs with a cane, and suggest that the method of cane placement should be taken into consideration by clinicians when teaching the cane user to ascend stairs.

Keywords: Cane, Stair ascent, Center of mass (COM), Balance, Biomechanics

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Part of the material was presented with a title of “Optimal strategy of cane use during stair ascent” with a poster in IIX International Society of Biomechanics”, Cleveland OH, USA, on 8/2/2005.

PII: S0966-6362(10)00219-5

doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.07.015

Gait & Posture
Volume 32, Issue 4 , Pages 530-535, October 2010