Gait & Posture
Volume 32, Issue 4 , Pages 540-546 , October 2010

Comparison of visual and haptic feedback during training of lower extremities

  • T. Koritnik

      Affiliations

    • University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Laboratory of Robotics and Biomedical Engineering, Trzaska 25, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +386 1 4768 742; fax: +386 1 4768 239.
    • ,
  • A. Koenig

      Affiliations

    • ETH Zurich, Department of Mechanical and Process Engineering, Institute of Robotics and Intelligent Systems (IRIS), Sensory-Motor Systems Lab, Zurich, Switzerland
    • ,
  • T. Bajd

      Affiliations

    • University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Laboratory of Robotics and Biomedical Engineering, Trzaska 25, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
    • ,
  • R. Riener

      Affiliations

    • ETH Zurich, Department of Mechanical and Process Engineering, Institute of Robotics and Intelligent Systems (IRIS), Sensory-Motor Systems Lab, Zurich, Switzerland
    • University of Zurich, University Hospital Balgrist, Spinal Cord Injury Center, Zurich, Switzerland
    • ,
  • M. Munih

      Affiliations

    • University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Laboratory of Robotics and Biomedical Engineering, Trzaska 25, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia

Received 3 December 2008 ,Revised 1 July 2010 ,Accepted 20 July 2010.

References 

  1. Holden MK. Virtual environments for motor rehabilitation: review. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2005;8(3):187–211
  2. Lateiner JE, Sainburg RL. Differential contributions of vision and proprioception to movement accuracy. Exp Brain Res. 2003;151:446–454
  3. Jones KE, Wessberg J, Vallbo A. Proprioceptive feedback is reduced during adaptation to a visuomotor transformation: preliminary findings. Neuroreport. 2001;12(18):4029–4033
  4. Theasby PJ. The virtues of virtual reality. GEC Rev. 1992;7:131–145
  5. Bliss JP, Tidwell PD, Guest MA. The effectiveness of virtual reality for administering spatial navigation training to firefighters. Presence-Teleop Virt. 1997;6:73–86
  6. Schmelter A, Jansen-Osmann P, Heil M. Empirical evaluation of virtual environment technology as an experimental tool in developmental spatial cognition research. Eur J Cogn Psychol. 2009;21(5):724–739
  7. Todorov E, Shadmer R, Bizzi E. Augmented feedback presented in a virtual environment accelerates learning of a difficult motor task. J Motor Behav. 1997;29:147–158
  8. Rose FD, Attree EA, Brooks BM, Parslow DM, Penn PR, Ambihaipahan N. Training in virtual environments: transfer to real world tasks and equivalence to real task training. Ergonomics. 2000;43:494–511
  9. Jaffe DL, Brown DA, Pierson-Carey CD, Buckley EL, Lew HL. Stepping over obstacles to improve walking in individuals with post-stroke hemiplegia. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2004;41(3A):283–292
  10. Fukuda T. The stepping test. Two phases of the labyrinthine reflex. Acta Otolaryngol. 1958;50:95–108
  11. Garcia RK, Nelson AJ, Ling W, Van Olden C. Comparing stepping-in-place and gait ability in adults with and without hemiplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82(1):36–42
  12. Sasaki O, Taguchi K, Kikukawa M, Ogiba T. Stepping analysis in patients with spinocerebellar degeneration and Parkinson's disease. Acta Otolaryngol. 1993;113(4):466–470
  13. Wirz M, Zemon DH, Rupp R, Scheel A, Colombo G, Dietz V, et al. Effectiveness of automated locomotor training in patients with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury: a multicenter trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(4):672–680
  14. Hornby TG, Zemon DH, Campbell D. Robotic-assisted, body-weight-supported treadmill training in individuals following motor incomplete spinal cord injury. Phys Ther. 2005;85(1):52–66
  15. Koritnik T, Bajd T, Munih M. Virtual environment for lower-extremities training. Gait Posture. 2008;27:323–330
  16. Kurillo G, Bajcsy R, Nahrsted K, Kreylos O. Immersive 3D environment for remote collaboration and training of physical activities. In: Proceedings of 2008 IEEE virtual reality conference. Reno, NV, USA, March 8–12. 2008;p. 269–270
  17. Riener R, Lunenburger L, Jezernik S, Anderschitz M, Colombo G, Dietz V. Patient cooperative strategies for robot-aided treadmill training: first experimental results. IEEE Trans Neur Syst Reh. 2005;13(3):380–394
  18. Riener R, Lunenburger L, Colombo G. Human-centered robotics applied to gait training and assessment. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2006;43(5):679–694
  19. Giese MA, Poggio T. Synthesis and recognition of biological motion patterns based on linear superposition of prototypical motion sequences. In: Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE Workshop on multi-view modeling and analysis of visual scene. Fort Collins, CO, USA, June 21–23. 1999;p. 73–80
  20. Zimmons P, Panter A. The influence of rendering quality on presence and task performance in a virtual environment. In: Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE Virtual reality. Los Angeles, CA, USA, March 22–26. 2003;p. 293–294
  21. Alton F, Baldey L, Caplan S, Morrissey MC. A kinematic comparison of overground and treadmill walking. Clin Biomech. 1998;13(6):434–440
  22. Thaut MH, McIntosh GC, Prassas SG, Rice RR. Effect of rhythmic auditory cuing on temporal stride parameters and EMG patterns in normal gait. J Neurol Rehabil. 1992;6:185–190
  23. Prassas SG, Thaut MH, McIntosh GC, Rice RR. Effect of auditory rhythmic cuing on gait kinematic parameters of stroke patients. Gait Posture. 1997;6(3):218–223
  24. Russolo M. Sound-evoked postural responses in normal subjects. Acta Otolaryngol. 2002;122:21–27
  25. Polechonski J, Blaszczyk J. The effect of acoustic noise on postural sway in male and female subjects. J Hum Kinet. 2006;15:37–52
  26. Krebs HI, Hogan N. Therapeutic robotics: a technology push. Proc IEEE. 2006;94(9):1727–1738
  27. Cailette F, Howard T. Real-time markerless human body tracking with multi-view 3-D voxel reconstruction. In: Proceedings of the 2004 British machine vision conference, vol. 2. London, UK, September 7–9. 2004;p. 597–606
  28. Wellner M, Schaufelberger A, Zitzewitz J, Riener R. Evaluation of visual and auditory feedback in virtual obstacle walking. Presence-Teleop Virt. 2008;17(5):512–524
  29. Ernst MO, Banks MS. Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature. 2002;415(24):429–433
  30. Scheidt RA, Conditt MA, Secco EL, Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Interaction of visual and proprioceptive feedback during adaptation of human reaching movements. J Neurophysiol. 2005;93:3200–3213
  31. Smeets JBJ, van den Dobbelsteen JJ, de Grave DDJ, van Beers RJ, Brenner E. Sensory integration does not lead to sensory calibration. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2006;103(49):18781–18786
  32. van Beers RJ, Sittig AC, van der Gon JJD. Integration of Proprioceptive and visual position-information: an experimentally supported model. J Neurophysiol. 1999;81(3):1355–1364
  33. Feygin D, Keehner M, Tendick F. Haptic guidance: experimental evaluation of a haptic training method for a perceptual motor skill. In: Proceedings of the 2002 symposium on haptic interfaces for virtual environment and teleoperator systems (HAPTICS’02). Orlando, FL, USA, March 24–25. 2002;p. 40–47
  34. Gunn C, Muller W, Datta A. Performance improvement with haptic assistance: a quantitative assessment. In: Proceedings of the 2009 joint Eurohaptics conference and symposium on haptic interfaces for virtual environment and teleoperator systems. Salt Lake City, UT, USA, March 18–20. 2009;p. 511–516

PII: S0966-6362(10)00221-3

doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.07.017

Gait & Posture
Volume 32, Issue 4 , Pages 540-546 , October 2010

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution