Gait & Posture
Volume 32, Issue 4 , Pages 547-551, October 2010

Low vision affects dynamic stability of gait

  • Ann Hallemans

      Affiliations

    • Research group of Functional Morphology, University of Antwerp, Belgium
    • Division of Neuro – and Psychomotor Physiotherapy, Department of Health Care, University College of Antwerp, Belgium
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Research Group of Functional Morphology, Department of Biology, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, B-2610 Antwerp, Belgium. Tel.: +32 03 820 22 60; fax: +32 03 820 22 71.
  • ,
  • Els Ortibus

      Affiliations

    • Department of Paediatrics, University Hospital of Leuven, Belgium
  • ,
  • Francoise Meire

      Affiliations

    • Hopital Universitaire Des Enfants Reine Fabiola (HUDERF), Brussels, Belgium
  • ,
  • Peter Aerts

      Affiliations

    • Research group of Functional Morphology, University of Antwerp, Belgium
    • Department of Movement and Sport Sciences, University of Ghent, Belgium

Received 18 January 2010; received in revised form 20 July 2010; accepted 25 July 2010. published online 01 September 2010.

Abstract 

The objective of this study was to demonstrate specific differences in gait patterns between those with and without a visual impairment. We performed a biomechanical analysis of the gait pattern of young adults (27±13 years old) with a visual impairment (n=10) in an uncluttered environment and compared it to the gait pattern of age matched controls (n=20). Normally sighted adults were tested in a full vision and no vision condition. Differences are found in gait between both groups and both situations. Adults with a visual impairment walked with a shorter stride length (1.14±0.21m), less trunk flexion (4.55±5.14°) and an earlier plantar foot contact at heel strike (1.83±3.49°) than sighted individuals (1.39±0.08m; 11.07±4.01°; 5.10±3.53°). When sighted individuals were blindfolded (no vision condition) they showed similar gait adaptations as well as a slower walking speed (0.84±0.28ms−1), a lower cadence (96.88±13.71stepsmin−1) and limited movements of the hip (38.24±6.27°) and the ankle in the saggital plane (−5.60±5.07°) compared to a full vision condition (1.27±0.13ms−1; 110.55±7.09stepsmin−1; 45.32±4.57°; −16.51±6.59°).

Results showed that even in an uncluttered environment vision is important for locomotion control. The differences between those with and without a visual impairment, and between the full vision and no vision conditions, may reflect a more cautious walking strategy and adaptive changes employed to use the foot to probe the ground for haptic exploration.

Keywords: Locomotion, Gait, Low vision, Kinematics, Stability

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0966-6362(10)00222-5

doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.07.018

Gait & Posture
Volume 32, Issue 4 , Pages 547-551, October 2010