Gait & Posture
Volume 32, Issue 4 , Pages 664-666 , October 2010

Footscan pressure insoles: Accuracy and reliability of force and pressure measurements in running

Received 4 March 2010 ,Revised 28 July 2010 ,Accepted 6 August 2010.

References 

  1. Martinez-Nova A, Cuevas-García J, Pascual-Huerta J, Sánchez-Rodríguez R. BioFoot in-shoe system: normal values and assessment of the reliability and repeatability. The Foot. 2007;17:190–196
  2. Hurkmans HLP, Bussmann JBJ, Benda E, Verhaar JAN, Stam HJ. Techniques for measuring weight bearing during standing and walking. Clin Biomech. 2003;18(7):576–589
  3. Woodburn J, Halliwell PS. Observations on the F-Scan in-shoe pressure measuring system. Clin Biomech. 1996;11(5):301–304
  4. Dixon SJ, James IT, Blackburn K, Pettican N, Low D. Influence of footwear and soil density on loading within the shoe and soil surface during running. J Sport Eng Tech. 2008;222:1–10
  5. Portney LG, Watkins MP. Statistical measures of reliability. In: Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. East Norwalk: Appleton & Lange; 1993;
  6. Boyd LA, Bontrager EL, Mulroy SJ, Perry J. The reliability and validity of the Novel Pedar System of in-shoe pressure measurement during free Ambulation. Gait Posture. 1997;5(2):165
  7. Barnett S, Cunningham JL, West S. A comparison of vertical force and temporal parameters produced by an in-shoe pressure measuring system and a force platform. Clin Biomech. 2001;16(Suppl.):353–357
  8. Kalpen A, Seitz P. Comparison between the force values measured with the Pedar system and Kistler platform. Gait Posture. 1994;2:238–239
  9. Kirtley C. Clinical gait analysis: theory and practice. London: Churchill Livingstone; 2006;

PII: S0966-6362(10)00226-2

doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.08.002

Gait & Posture
Volume 32, Issue 4 , Pages 664-666 , October 2010