Gait & Posture
Volume 35, Issue 1 , Pages 1-5, January 2012

The interdependency of peak pressure and pressure–time integral in pressure studies on diabetic footwear: No need to report both parameters

  • R. Waaijman

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Department of Rehabilitation, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, P.O. 22660, 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Tel.: +31 20 5662416; fax: +31 20 5669154.
  • ,
  • S.A. Bus

Department of Rehabilitation, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Received 9 November 2010; received in revised form 29 June 2011; accepted 9 July 2011. published online 26 September 2011.

Highlights

► Peak pressure (MPP) and peak pressure–time integral (PTI) may be interchangeable. ► We examined the interdependency of MPP and PTI in diabetic footwear. ► MPP and PTI are interdependent in diabetic patients wearing prescribed footwear. ► Interdependency is strongest in foot regions most prone to ulceration. ► The value of reporting PTI next to MPP in the same footwear study is small.

Abstract 

Background

In plantar pressure studies on diabetic footwear, both the maximum peak pressure (MPP) and peak pressure–time integral (PTI) are often reported. However, specific conclusions for each parameter are not commonly reported, suggesting these parameters may be interchangeable. The aim was to explore the interdependency of MPP and PTI in diabetic patients wearing different types of footwear.

Methods

In-shoe plantar pressure was measured in 69 neuropathic diabetic patients who walked in custom made footwear, forefoot offloading shoes, cast shoes, and/or standard footwear. For each of six anatomical foot regions, correlation coefficients were calculated between MPP and PTI. To assess parameter congruency, the percentage of patients showing correlation coefficients >0.7 or coefficients of variation for both MPP and PTI <10%, was calculated.

Results

Across all footwear conditions, MPP and PTI were highly correlated in the forefoot and midfoot (r>0.78 in all but one foot region in one footwear condition). Lower correlations coefficients were found in the rearfoot (r=0.43–0.45). Across regions, between 46% and 87% of patients (mean 72%) showed parameter congruency in the forefoot and midfoot.

Conclusions

The results showed that the MPP and PTI are highly interdependent in those foot regions most at risk for plantar ulceration in patients wearing commonly prescribed footwear. Since MPP has been shown to date to be the clinically more relevant parameter of the two, these results suggest that the value of reporting PTI in addition to MPP in the same diabetic footwear study is small.

Keywords: Diabetic foot, Footwear, In-shoe plantar pressure, Peak pressure, Pressure–time integral

 

PII: S0966-6362(11)00229-3

doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.07.006

Gait & Posture
Volume 35, Issue 1 , Pages 1-5, January 2012