Gait & Posture
Volume 35, Issue 1 , Pages 1-5 , January 2012

The interdependency of peak pressure and pressure–time integral in pressure studies on diabetic footwear: No need to report both parameters

  • R. Waaijman

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Department of Rehabilitation, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, P.O. 22660, 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Tel.: +31 20 5662416; fax: +31 20 5669154.
  • ,
  • S.A. Bus

Received 9 November 2010 ,Revised 29 June 2011 ,Accepted 9 July 2011.

  • Image Result

    The four different types of footwear tested in this study: (A) custom made therapeutic footwear, (B) a cast shoe, (C) a forefoot offloading shoe, and (D) a standard shoe.

    The four different types of footwear tested in this study: (A) custom made therapeutic footwear, (B) a cast shoe, (C) a forefoot offloading shoe, and (D) a standard shoe.

  • Image Result

    Peak pressure–time curves shown in the left panes and scatter plots of maximum peak pressure (MPP) versus peak pressure–time integral (PTI) shown in the right panes for two foot regions in one subject

    Peak pressure–time curves shown in the left panes and scatter plots of maximum peak pressure (MPP) versus peak pressure–time integral (PTI) shown in the right panes for two foot regions in one subject: the midfoot and metatarsals 2–5. These figures clarify the two different criteria of congruence used for the individual analysis. The midfoot region shows a high correlation coefficient between MPP and PTI (r>0.7). The metatarsals 2–5 region shows a low correlation coefficient (r<0.7), but small coefficients of variation (CV<10%) for both parameters, indicating a high congruence of peak pressure–time curves from subsequent foot steps.

PII: S0966-6362(11)00229-3

doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.07.006

Gait & Posture
Volume 35, Issue 1 , Pages 1-5 , January 2012