Gait & Posture
Volume 35, Issue 2 , Pages 277-281, February 2012

Swing limb mechanics and minimum toe clearance in people with knee osteoarthritis

  • Pazit Levinger

      Affiliations

    • Musculoskeletal Research Centre, Faculty of Health Sciences, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria 3086, Australia
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +61 3 94795260; fax: +61 3 94795415.
  • ,
  • Daniel T.H. Lai

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Sports, Exercise and Active Living (ISEAL), School of Sports and Exercise Science, Victoria University, Melbourne Victoria 8001, Australia
  • ,
  • Hylton B. Menz

      Affiliations

    • Musculoskeletal Research Centre, Faculty of Health Sciences, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria 3086, Australia
  • ,
  • Adam D. Morrow

      Affiliations

    • Musculoskeletal Research Centre, Faculty of Health Sciences, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria 3086, Australia
  • ,
  • Julian A. Feller

      Affiliations

    • Musculoskeletal Research Centre, Faculty of Health Sciences, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria 3086, Australia
  • ,
  • John R. Bartlett

      Affiliations

    • Warringal Private Medical Centre, Heidelberg Victoria 3084, Australia
  • ,
  • Neil R. Bergman

      Affiliations

    • Warringal Private Medical Centre, Heidelberg Victoria 3084, Australia
  • ,
  • Rezaul Begg

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Sports, Exercise and Active Living (ISEAL), School of Sports and Exercise Science, Victoria University, Melbourne Victoria 8001, Australia

Received 23 April 2011; received in revised form 8 September 2011; accepted 20 September 2011. published online 27 January 2012.

Abstract 

Objective

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) has been shown to be a risk factor for falls. Reductions in foot clearance during the swing phase of walking can cause a trip and potentially lead to a fall. This study examined the swing phase mechanics of people with and without knee OA during walking.

Design

Minimum toe clearance (MTC) height, joint angles at the time of MTC and the influence of the angular changes of the hip, knee and ankle of the swing leg on foot clearance using sensitivity analysis were investigated in 50 knee OA participants and 28 age-matched asymptomatic controls.

Results

Although both groups had a similar MTC height (controls: 12.8±6.7mm, knee OA: 13.4±7.0mm), the knee OA group used a different strategy to achieve the same foot clearance, as evidenced by greater knee flexion (52.5±5.3° vs 49.4±4.8°, p=0.007), greater hip abduction (−3.6±3.3° vs −1.8±3.3°, p=0.03) and less ankle adduction (2.8±1.9° vs 4.2±2.1°, p=0.01).

Conclusion

MTC height was comparable between the groups, however a different swing phase mechanism was used by the knee OA. Although adequate MTC is an important component of safe locomotion, it does not appear to be impaired in people with knee OA. Other factors, such as inadequate responses to postural perturbation, may be responsible for falls in this group.

Keywords: Knee osteoarthritis, Minimum foot clearance, Walking, Falls

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This study was funded by the Clive and Vera Ramaciotti Foundation and the Arthritis Australia. HBM is currently a National Health and Medical Research Council fellow (Clinical Career Development Award, ID: 433049). The authors would like to thank Margaret Perrott for her assistance in the data collection and Mr. Barry Gavin for his assistance with patient recruitment.

PII: S0966-6362(11)00304-3

doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.09.020

Gait & Posture
Volume 35, Issue 2 , Pages 277-281, February 2012