Gait & Posture
Volume 35, Issue 4 , Pages 636-640, April 2012

Ambulatory measurement of the scapulohumeral rhythm: Intra- and inter-operator agreement of a protocol based on inertial and magnetic sensors

  • I. Parel

      Affiliations

    • I.N.A.I.L. Centro Protesi, Vigorso di Budrio, Italy
    • DI3, University of Trieste, Italy
  • ,
  • A.G. Cutti

      Affiliations

    • I.N.A.I.L. Centro Protesi, Vigorso di Budrio, Italy
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Motion Analysis Laboratory, I.N.A.I.L. Prostheses Centre, Via Rabuina, 14, I-40054 Vigorso di Budrio (BO), Italy. Tel.: +39 051 6936601; fax: +39 051 6936609.
  • ,
  • G. Fiumana

      Affiliations

    • Unit of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, “D. Cervesi” Hospital, Cattolica, Italy
  • ,
  • G. Porcellini

      Affiliations

    • Unit of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, “D. Cervesi” Hospital, Cattolica, Italy
  • ,
  • G. Verni

      Affiliations

    • I.N.A.I.L. Centro Protesi, Vigorso di Budrio, Italy
  • ,
  • A.P. Accardo

      Affiliations

    • DI3, University of Trieste, Italy

Received 6 September 2011; received in revised form 22 November 2011; accepted 19 December 2011. published online 02 February 2012.

Highlights

► We developed a motion analysis protocol named ISEO for the ambulatory measure of the scapulohumeral rhythm. ► We assessed ISEO intra and inter-operator agreement involving 2 operators and 40 subjects. ► We quantified the similarity of scapulohumeral patterns and the smallest detectable difference in scapula range of motion. ► The similarity was acceptable for most of the scapula rotations. ► The smallest detectable difference ranged from 4.4° to 8.6°.

Abstract 

To measure the scapulohumeral rhythm (SHR) in outpatient settings, the motion analysis protocol named ISEO (INAIL Shoulder and Elbow Outpatient protocol) was developed, based on inertial and magnetic sensors. To complete the sensor-to-segment calibration, ISEO requires the involvement of an operator for sensor placement and for positioning the patient's arm in a predefined posture. Since this can affect the measure, this study aimed at quantifying ISEO intra- and inter-operator agreement. Forty subjects were considered, together with two operators, A and B. Three measurement sessions were completed for each subject: two by A and one by B. In each session, the humerus and scapula rotations were measured during sagittal and scapular plane elevation movements. ISEO intra- and inter-operator agreement were assessed by computing, between sessions, the: (1) similarity of the scapulohumeral patterns through the Coefficient of Multiple Correlation (CMC2), both considering and excluding the difference of the initial value of the scapula rotations between two sessions (inter-session offset); (2) 95% Smallest Detectable Difference (SDD95) in scapula range of motion.

Results for CMC2 showed that the intra- and inter-operator agreement is acceptable (median0.85, lower-whisker 0.75) for most of the scapula rotations, independently from the movement and the inter-session offset. The only exception is the agreement for scapula protraction–retraction and for scapula medio-lateral rotation during abduction (inter-operator), which is acceptable only if the inter-session offset is removed. SDD95 values ranged from 4.4° to 8.6° for the inter-operator and between 4.9° and 8.5° for the intra-operator agreement.

In conclusion, ISEO presents a high intra- and inter-operator agreement, particularly with the scapula inter-session offset removed.

Keywords: Motion analysis, Kinematics, Shoulder, Inertial and magnetic sensors, Agreement

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0966-6362(11)00823-X

doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.12.015

Gait & Posture
Volume 35, Issue 4 , Pages 636-640, April 2012