Elsevier

Gait & Posture

Volume 39, Issue 1, January 2014, Pages 490-494
Gait & Posture

Gait initiation: The first four steps in adults aged 20–25 years, 65–79 years, and 80–91 years

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.08.037Get rights and content

Highlights

  • We establish the age-related changes in the first four steps of gait.

  • Young adult group was compared to two groups: 65–79 years and 80–91 years old.

  • All age groups appear to control speed in a principled manner across the four steps.

  • Older groups had higher step length and step width variability.

  • Healthy 80–91 year olds did not demonstrate gait changes associated with falls.

Abstract

Transitioning from standing to walking requires equilibrium to be maintained while a forward propulsive force is generated. The ability to manage these competing demands is compromised by the progressive sensory, neural and motor declines associated with aging. The purpose of this study was to establish the age-related changes in the first four steps of gait in three age groups: 20–25 years old (yo) (N = 19), 65–79 yo (N = 11), and 80–91 yo (N = 18). Participants stood comfortably and then walked at a self-selected pace for 3.2 m. Gait speed and step length (SL) both significantly decreased with each age category at each of the first four steps. However, the gait speed changes suggest that older groups control speed in a principled manner across the four steps, which was similar to the speed control of 20–25 yo. With successive steps, 20–25 yo demonstrated a progressive decrease in SL variability, but SL variability of the two older groups did not change. Step width (SW) did not change as a function of age, but SW variability was higher for the two older groups. Higher SL and SW variability may reflect more errors in foot placement and/or decreased center of mass control in the older groups. Further, it appears that AP COM control improves with successive steps in young adults while ML COM control decreases with successive steps in all age groups. When comparing the two older groups, healthy 80–91 yo walked slower with a shorter SL, but did not demonstrate changes associated with falls (SL and/or SW variability).

Introduction

Mobility is an important factor in maintaining independence and quality of life in older adults [1], [2]. Age-related loss of mobility is due to many factors including progressive sensory, neural, and motor declines. The ultimate outcome of these declines is an increased rate of falls: one in three adults over the age of 65 falls each year [3], [4], and this number doubles after age 80 [5]. A standard paradigm to establish age-related mobility changes is the comparison of younger and older individuals. However, when all older adults over the age of 65 are placed into a single experimental group, age-related changes in mobility that occur throughout older adulthood are not captured. Given the steep increase in falls after age 80 and the heterogeneity of the aging population, it is important to document the impact of advancing age on mobility.

Examination of multiple older age groups has demonstrated the detrimental impact of advancing age. When avoiding an unexpected obstacle, advancing age was a significant predictor of success rates and reaction times [6], consistent with the observation that more falls are observed in the oldest adults [5]. The examination of advancing age should be extended to other tasks that occur in daily life and are related to falls. For example, falls occur most often during activities of ‘ambulation’, including walking, turning, and standing [7], [8] or while walking, carrying objects, or reaching/leaning [9]. In addition, the majority of falls occur in the home for older adults [9], and the number of falls in the home increases with age [7]. Typical ambulation tasks in the home, such as setting the table or answering the phone, require just a few steps due to room size constraints. The transition from standing to walking may be especially challenging, as the body must be accelerated forward from a stationary posture, while simultaneously maintaining equilibrium with a smaller base of support due to the shorter steps [10]. The ability of the first few steps to characterize adults with compromised balance is demonstrated by the observations that elderly fallers had a smaller step length (SL) and higher SL variability than elderly non-fallers [11]. Further, populations with higher fall risk, including persons with Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease, exhibit higher spatiotemporal variability during gait initiation [12], [13]. Therefore, the transition from standing to steady state gait is an ideal paradigm to examine the impact of advancing age on mobility. Existing research has focused mainly on the first step, but examination of the temporal evolution of the gait parameters as speed increases with each subsequent step may provide unique insights.

The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of advancing age in the first four steps following gait initiation. Since many diseases and disorders are associated with age, it is important to examine a healthy, active older population to ensure that observations are not confounded by disease, disorder, or inactivity. Three age groups were examined: young adults aged 20–25 years old (20–25 yo), older adults aged 65–79 years old (65–79 yo), and older adults over 80 years of age (80–91 yo). We hypothesized the following: (1) 65–79 yo will have a smaller base of support (SL and step width), slower gait speed and higher variability than 20–25 yo across all four steps, (2) 80–91 yo will have a smaller base of support, slower gait speed and higher variability than 65–79 yo across all four steps, and (3) the largest differences across age groups will be observed in the first step.

Section snippets

Methods

Forty-eight adults were categorized into three age groups: 20–25 yo (N = 19), 65–79 yo (N = 11), and 80-91yo (N = 18) (Table 1). All participants were healthy, with no neuromuscular or orthopedic disorders that would impact gait, walked without the use of an aid, and were able to climb 1.5 flights of stairs (37 steps). The latter requirement ensured a minimum threshold of strength and fitness, as stair climbing imposes strength and aerobic demands. All participants gave informed consent approved by the

Gait speed

Interaction effects (step number by age group) were observed for gait speed (F(6,896) = 4.26, p < 0.01, Fig. 1a). Post hoc analysis revealed that each age group progressively increased gait speed from steps 1–3. The gait speed in step 4 leveled off for 20–25 yo and 65–79 yo, while 80–91 yo continued to increase speed in this step. The speed at each step was slower with increasing age. The percent change in gait speed between 65–79 yo and 20–25 yo progressively decreased with each step: −20, −16, −13,

Discussion

The transition from standing to steady state gait is a challenging daily activity, providing an ideal task to examine changes as a function of advancing age. The robust age-related changes during steady state gait, slower gait speed and shorter step length (SL) (e.g. [14]), were also observed during the transition paradigm of this study. Our analysis emphasized gait speed, as it reflects health, functional status [15], and predicts survival [16]. Further, in order to predict survival, previous

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

References (33)

  • J.L. Helbostad et al.

    The effect of gait speed on lateral balance control during walking in healthy elderly

    Gait Posture

    (2003)
  • T.M. Owings et al.

    Measuring step kinematic variability on an instrumented treadmill: how many steps are enough?

    J Biomech

    (2003)
  • W.J. Rejeski et al.

    Physical activity and quality of life in older adults

    J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci

    (2001)
  • A. Shumway-Cook et al.

    Environmental demands associated with community mobility in older adults with and without mobility disabilities

    Phys Ther

    (2002)
  • A. Blake et al.

    Falls by elderly people at home: prevalence and associated factors

    Age Ageing

    (1988)
  • M. Tinetti et al.

    Risk factors for falls among elderly persons living within the community

    N Engl J Med

    (1988)
  • Cited by (40)

    • Changes in the control of obstacle crossing in middle age become evident as gait task difficulty increases

      2019, Gait and Posture
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, it is evident that the middle-aged group was more similar to the older group in foot placement variability. The age-related progressive increase in step width variability may indicate a reduction in medial-lateral control of the center of mass during the obstacle crossing task, as higher step width variability may reflect increased errors in medial-lateral foot placement or reactive adjustments to control the center of mass [10,18,25–27]. The lack of change in step length variability with age may indicate that the decline is limited to the medial-lateral control for this locomotor task.

    • Spatiotemporal and kinematic characteristics of gait initiation across a wide speed range

      2018, Gait and Posture
      Citation Excerpt :

      This action requires the coordinated movement of both lower limbs. Previous research has described typical movement patterns for a range of ages of healthy adults [1–3] and for those with disability [4–7]. These studies highlight the impact of lack of muscle control, or muscle weakness on the performance of gait initiation.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text