Elsevier

Gait & Posture

Volume 43, January 2016, Pages 87-92
Gait & Posture

Foot sole skin vibration perceptual thresholds are elevated in a standing posture compared to sitting

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.10.027Get rights and content

Highlights

  • We measured skin vibration thresholds at the foot sole while standing and sitting.

  • Multiple frequencies were used to activate different cutaneous afferent populations.

  • Thresholds across all frequencies were increased during standing.

Abstract

Foot sole sensitivity is commonly assessed while individuals are seated or prone; however the primary role of foot sole cutaneous feedback is for the control of upright stance and gait. The aim of this study was to compare vibration perceptual thresholds across the foot sole between sitting and standing postures. Vibration perceptual thresholds were measured in sitting and standing postures in 18 healthy participants (8 male) using a custom vibration device. Two foot sole locations (heels and metatarsals) were tested at four vibration frequencies (3, 15, 40, and 250 Hz) selected to target different cutaneous afferent populations. At each frequency, perceptual thresholds across the foot sole were significantly higher in the standing posture compared to the sitting posture; this is indicative of lower sensitivity while standing. In addition, threshold differences between the heels and metatarsals for lower frequency vibratory stimuli were more pronounced while standing, with higher thresholds observed at the heels. Our results demonstrate that standing significantly alters sensitivity across the foot sole. Therefore, conducting perceptual tests at the foot sole during stance could potentially provide more direct information about the ability of cutaneous afferents to signal tactile information in a state where this feedback can contribute to postural control.

Introduction

Cutaneous afferents that innervate the foot sole signal information about pressure distribution under the feet as well as dynamic events such as slips and contact with the ground [1], [2]. This feedback plays an important role in the control of gait and posture [3], [4]. A decline in foot sole skin sensitivity occurs naturally with aging [5], [6] and as a result of neurological disorders, including Parkinson's disease and diabetic peripheral neuropathy [7], [8]. This decline in sensitivity is associated with poorer postural control and an increased risk of falls in these populations [6], [7], [8]. However, since sensory testing has been conducted exclusively with individuals seated or prone [5], [6], the natural ability of foot sole cutaneous afferents to signal dynamic events during stance remains unknown.

Cutaneous feedback is provided by four classes of cutaneous afferents that innervate the glabrous skin of the hands and feet. Each afferent class demonstrates unique adaptation and receptive field properties, and transmits specific features of tactile information. Fast adapting (FA) type I and type II afferents (innervating Meissner and Pacinian corpuscles, respectively) are sensitive to dynamic stimuli and their activation can evoke percepts of flutter and vibration [9], [10]. FA afferent feedback is thought to be responsible for signaling contact velocity and slips across the skin [1]. In contrast, slowly adapting (SA) type I and type II afferents (innervating Merkel discs and Ruffini endings, respectively) respond to sustained indentation and skin stretch and their activation can evoke percepts of pressure and movement at the skin [9], [10]. Recordings from single cutaneous afferents innervating the hand provide evidence that each afferent class is maximally responsive within a specific vibration frequency bandwidth; SA afferents to low frequencies (SAII <8 Hz, SAI 8–16 Hz) and FA afferents to higher frequencies (FAI 8–64 Hz and FAII >64 Hz) [11], [12], [13].

Vibration perceptual threshold (VPT) testing has been used to assess changes in skin sensitivity that occur with aging and neurological disorders [1], [5], [6], [7], [8]. VPT can be measured across different frequencies to allow for the function of the underlying cutaneous mechanoreceptors to be inferred. For example, older adults have been found to have higher VPTs at 50, 250 and 400 Hz [6] and at 25 and 100 Hz [5] compared to younger adults. This indicates a decline in cutaneous sensitivity across fast adapting cutaneous afferent classes, which is thought to contribute to observed impairments in postural control [5], [6].

To date, perceptual thresholds at the foot sole during stance, a position where skin feedback is of functional significance for the control of posture and gait, are unknown. The aim of this study was to compare VPT measured in a standing posture to VPT measured in a sitting posture at four frequencies designed to generate different cutaneous afferent population responses (3, 15, 40, and 250 Hz). Sustained pressure is known to cause adaptation in cutaneous afferents, which could make them less responsive to additional stimuli [14]. In addition, increased sensory feedback generated by movement and muscle contraction has been shown to gate the transmission of tactile sensory information to the primary somatosensory cortex [15], [16], [17]. Therefore, due to the load on the feet and increased postural demand during stance, it was hypothesized that threshold levels at the foot sole would be increased across all frequencies.

Section snippets

Participants

Eighteen healthy young adults aged, 22.2 ± 1.8 (8 males) participated in the study. Participants were free of neurological and musculoskeletal disorders. All participants provided written informed consent and all procedures were approved by the University of Guelph Research Ethics Board, which abides by the declaration of Helsinki.

Experimental setup

A custom device was developed to apply vibration to both foot soles during sitting and standing postures (Fig. 1A). This device consisted of a raised platform that

Results

Across all frequencies and both foot sole locations, VPT was higher in the standing posture compared to the sitting posture (Table 1, Fig. 2). Statistically, there were significant main effects of posture on VPT, indicating higher thresholds (lower sensitivity) while standing at all frequencies (3 Hz: F(1,17) = 5.92, p = 0.0263; 15 Hz: F(1,17) = 7.73, p = 0.0128; 40 Hz: F(1,17) = 8.94, p = 0.0082; and 250 Hz: F(1,17) = 7.51, p = 0.0140) (Fig. 2A). There were significant main effects of foot sole location on VPT

Discussion

Using a custom device, we were able to show that vibration perception thresholds (VPTs) at the heels and metatarsals were higher in a standing posture compared to a sitting posture. This finding could have implications for how skin information contributes functionally and perceptually while the feet are under loaded conditions while standing. Standing was found to increase VPTs across all four frequencies tested, indicating a general decrease in sensitivity across cutaneous afferent populations

Conflict of interest

These authors have no conflicts of interest to state regarding work presented in the current manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge Dan Rose and Steve Brown for their technical support. This work was supported by funding from the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada: NSERC Canada Graduate Scholarship (Masters) to R.L. Mildren, NSERC Postsecondary Graduate Scholarship (Doctoral) to N.D.J. Strzalkowski, and NSERC Discovery Grant to L.R. Bent (grant number 237924).

Author contributions: RLM was involved in conception and study design, data collection and analysis, and

References (30)

  • C. Wells et al.

    Regional variation and changes with ageing in vibrotactile sensitivity in the human footsole

    J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci

    (2003)
  • L. Uccioli et al.

    Body sway in diabetic neuropathy

    Diabetes Care

    (1995)
  • G. Macefield et al.

    Perceptual responses to microstimulation of single afferents innervating joints, muscles and skin of the human hand

    J Physiol

    (1990)
  • W.H. Talbot et al.

    The sense of flutter-vibration: comparison of the human capacity with response patterns of mechanoreceptive afferents from the monkey hand

    J Neurophysiol

    (1968)
  • Y.Y. Leung et al.

    Time-course of vibratory adaptation and recovery in cutaneous mechanoreceptive afferents

    J Neurophysiol

    (2005)
  • Cited by (36)

    • Postural performance and plantar cutaneous vibration perception in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus

      2021, Heliyon
      Citation Excerpt :

      Since alterations of the force applied to the probe may affect tactile perception, force was controlled using a sensor (Hottinger U9B) [29]. An incremental forced-choice algorithm, modified after Mildren et al. [30], was implemented to automatically detect the VPT. Therefore, participants had to push a handheld trigger as soon as they perceived a vibration stimulus at the tested anatomical location.

    • A review of work environment risk factors influencing muscle fatigue

      2020, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics
    • Sensorimotor anatomy of gait, balance, and falls

      2018, Handbook of Clinical Neurology
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, the sensitivity, perceptual thresholds, and sign of reflex responses (reflex reversal) evoked by activation of cutaneous receptors on the sole of the foot are critically dependent upon the state of vertical support (e.g., standing vs. sitting) and phase of locomotion (Duysens et al., 1990; De Serres et al., 1995). Thresholds are higher during quiet standing than during sitting (Mildren et al., 2016). Perceptual thresholds also differ across the sole of the foot, with lower thresholds in the ball and arch of the foot and higher thresholds in the regions of the heel and toe (Inglis et al., 2002).

    • Sensorimotor control of standing balance

      2018, Handbook of Clinical Neurology
      Citation Excerpt :

      These properties may confer a role for FA afferents in coding transient balance-related movements (Kennedy and Inglis, 2002; Fallon et al., 2005). Note that loading of the feet while maintaining upright balance may increase the threshold of the foot sole afferents (Mildren et al., 2016), emphasizing that recordings from cutaneous afferents in a standing posture are critically needed to understand their role in balance. Afferents innervating joint receptors involved in somatosensation include low-threshold SA type I (Ruffini endings), low-threshold FA type II (Pacinian corpuscle), and high-threshold SA type III (Golgi-like receptors).

    • Subliminal electrical and mechanical stimulation does not improve foot sensitivity in healthy elderly subjects

      2018, Clinical Neurophysiology Practice
      Citation Excerpt :

      Since sensory data are recorded on a ratio scale, they lead to heteroscedastic errors (Nevill and Atkinson, 1997). To correct heteroscedasticity and the non-normality distribution, data were transformed with the natural logarithm (Mildren et al., 2015; Nevill and Atkinson, 1997). While the heteroscedasticity could be eliminated, not all parameters were distributed normally after transformation.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text