Elsevier

Gait & Posture

Volume 49, September 2016, Pages 437-442
Gait & Posture

Full length article
Altered dynamic postural control during gait termination following concussion

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.07.327Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Dynamic postural tasks can identify impairments post-concussion better than static.

  • Concussion acutely alters motor control strategy during planned GT.

  • COP displacements were altered during planned GT in concussed individuals.

  • COP velocities were altered during planned GT acutely post-concussion.

  • Planned GT is an effective tool for analyzing postural control post-concussion.

Abstract

Impaired postural control is a cardinal symptom following concussion. Planned gait termination (GT) is a non-novel, dynamic task that challenges postural control in individuals with neurological deficits, and it could be an impactful measure for identifying dynamic postural control impairments following concussion. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess acute post-concussion dynamic postural control utilizing a planned GT task. The concussion participants (n = 19, age: 19.0 ± 0.8 years, height: 177.0 ± 10.1 cm, weight: 83.3 ± 20.0 kg) completed five planned GT trials during preseason baseline testing (Baseline) and on Day 1 post-concussion (Day-1). Healthy control participants (n = 19, age: 20.4 ± 1.2 years, height: 173.8 ± 8.9 cm, weight: 80.2 ± 17.6 kg) completed the same trials a week apart. The dependent variables of interest included COP displacement and velocity in the mediolateral (ML) and anteroposterior (AP) axes during the three phases (braking, transitional, stabilization) of planned GT. There were significant interactions observed in both the braking ML and transitional AP displacement (p = 0.042, p = 0.030) and velocity (p = 0.027, p = 0.030). These results suggest a conservative post-concussion motor control strategy during planned GT. Further, these results support the use of dynamic postural control tasks as measures of post-concussion impairments.

Introduction

Impairments in postural control are a primary concussion symptom; thus, postural control testing is a recommended component of the multifaceted concussion assessment battery [1], [2]. Current concussion assessments include both clinical (Balance Error Scoring System (BESS)) and experimental (Sensory Organization Test (SOT)) protocols. The most commonly utilized clinical assessment tool, BESS, is limited by low interrater and intrarater reliability scores, test administration environment, and low sensitivity (0.34) acutely post-concussion [3], [4], [5], [6]. Despite its limitations, the BESS does have high content validity for identifying balance impairments following a concussion, and the modified version of the BESS, which is recommended by the 3rd edition of the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool, has demonstrated good reliability [7], [8], [9]. However, both the BESS and SOT are limited by substantial practice effects, potentially because these are novel tasks (e.g., standing barefoot on a foam surface with the eyes closed), and repeat administration has routinely identified improved performance [10], [11]. Further, the BESS and SOT are static assessments that rely on feedback mechanisms to maintain upright posture on an unstable surface and do not evaluate transitional, dynamic movements, which are likely more challenging to the postural control systems [12]. These limitations may explain the surprising finding that post-concussion static postural control often recovers prior to both symptom resolution and cognitive deficits [6]. Therefore, the utilization of common dynamic motor activities of daily living (ADL), which are unlikely to be subjected to a practice effect, may be more appropriate for identifying post-concussion impairments [13].

An acute post-concussion conservative gait strategy, consisting of reduced step velocity, step length, center of pressure (COP) and center of mass (COM) separation, as well as increased double support time and frontal plane COM sway, has been consistently identified [14], [15]. These deficits appear to persist for up to two months post-injury, suggesting impairments in dynamic postural control persist well beyond BESS recovery [16]. Gait is an innate, or non-novel, dynamic task, and the parameters are not generally susceptible to the practice effects in otherwise healthy young adults [17]. Gait performance is highly consistent in healthy college-aged recreational and student-athletes [18]. Specifically, changes in gait parameters (e.g., velocity, stride length) are most pronounced up to age 10, after which there are minimal changes in gait pattern [17]. Unlike quiet standing, unobstructed gait is less reliant on sensory feedback as both supraspinal planning (motor cortex and pyramidal tract) and central pattern generators are largely responsible for feedforward control [19], [20]. Further, transitional movements, such as initiating or terminating gait, are likely more challenging to dynamic postural control systems than gait, which likely increases the neurological resources required to safely complete the task [21].

Planned gait termination (GT) is a transitional motor task that encompasses the shift from cyclical gait to quiet standing and requires the central nervous system to anticipate, control, and slow the forward momentum of the body while maintaining the COM within the base of support (BOS) [22]. This transitional task is divided up into three phases: braking (S1), transitional (S2), and stabilization (S3). In fRMI studies, planned GT appears to be controlled supraspinally, with activation patterns identified within the right prefrontal area, specifically the right inferior frontal gyrus [19]. The planned GT task requires the participant be aware of the location or time to terminate gait and is comprised of a penultimate (second to last step before termination) and termination step [22]. Mechanically, planned GT requires two coupled braking mechanisms: (1) a reduction in the foot propulsive force during the penultimate step and (2) an increase in the braking force during the terminating step [22]. Thus, it is not surprising that GT has already identified both acute and lingering alterations in post-concussion propulsive and braking forces only; however, the COP trajectories have not been elucidated [23]. Further, individuals with compromised neurological systems (e.g., Parkinson’s disease, Cerebellar disease, moderate to severe traumatic brain injury) have noted planned GT deficits, including diminished COP displacements.

Planned GT is a stable, non-novel ADL task that challenges the postural control systems and that relies on active feedforward control [20]. Impaired postural control is a known consequence of concussion; however, most assessment protocols utilize novel static tasks that have not been associated with specific postural control mechanisms. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate planned GT performance between baseline and post-concussion individuals with comparison to healthy individuals. We hypothesize an interaction will be present wherein herein healthy control participants will demonstrate consistent task performance whereas the post-concussion participants will demonstrate an impairment during GT.

Section snippets

Participants

There were 38 participants in this study; 19 National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I student-athletes, from a single institution, diagnosed with a sports-related concussion and a control group consisting of 19 uninjured, physically active individuals from the same institution (Table 1). All concussions were identified by a certified athletic trainer and subsequently diagnosed by the team physician. The inclusion criteria for the concussion participants was a diagnosed concussion

Results

All participants completed the five trials without incident.

Discussion

This investigation utilized a mixed design analysis for the concussion participants, incorporating baseline data in the identification of post-concussion impairments in dynamic postural control. The main finding of this study was an altered COP displacement and velocity in the braking and transitional phases of planned GT, within the post-concussion group when compared to both their own baseline values and to matched controls. Specifically, a decreased COP displacement and velocity in the ML

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest associated with the present study.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the National Institute of Health/National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (1R15NS070744-01A1). The funding source had no role in the study design, data collection and interpretation, or decision to submit this manuscript for publication.

References (30)

  • G. Ryckewaert et al.

    Biomechanical mechanisms and centre of pressure trajectory during planned gait termination

    Neurophysiol. Clin.

    (2014)
  • J. Massion

    Movement, posture and equilibrium: interaction and coordination

    Prog. Neurobiol.

    (1992)
  • M. Bishop et al.

    Do people with Parkinson’s disease change strategy during unplanned gait termination?

    Neurosci. Lett.

    (2006)
  • S.P. Broglio et al.

    National Athletic Trainers’ Association position statement: management of sport concussion

    J. Athl. Train.

    (2014)
  • P. McCrory et al.

    Consensus statement on concussion in sport: the 4th International Conference on Concussion in Sport held in Zurich November 2012

    Br. J. Sports Med.

    (2013)
  • Cited by (30)

    • Clinical gait characteristics in the early post-concussion phase: A systematic review

      2023, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience
      Citation Excerpt :

      An interesting point to note is that while step length and velocity were acutely affected, there was no significant difference in the prior concussion and no prior concussion groups for these measurements, as such COP kinematics may be a more sensitive way to identify subtle gait deficit and the ongoing neurological impact of concussion. The three included studies assessing GT used various length walkways and force plates to assess step length, step velocity and COM and COP displacement and velocity in the braking, transitional and stabilisation phases of GT [12,14]. All three studies reviewed patients within 24 h following concussion.

    • Tandem gait test performance in healthy, physically active adults: Clinical implications for concussion evaluation

      2021, Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, the turn could be more sensitive to the effects of concussion. Concussed individuals have demonstrated impaired propulsive and breaking strategies while walking, and impaired dual-task turning gait speed.3,18,19 While we were unable to detect differences in turning times for those with a history of concussion compared to those with no history of concussion, this topic should be further explored.

    • Effect of motor-assisted elliptical training speed and body weight support on center of pressure movement variability

      2020, Gait and Posture
      Citation Excerpt :

      Conditions consisted of four BWS levels (0 %, 20 %, 40 %, 60 %) each performed at three motor-assisted elliptical training speeds (20, 40, 60 CPM). Participants were instructed to let the motor (that controlled speed of the elliptical pedals) guide their legs at each training speed [10]. Actual training speed and set training speed were monitored on the control console to ensure participants did not over-ride the motor’s assistance and cycle faster.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text