Short communicationConstituent Lower Extremity Work (CLEW) approach: A novel tool to visualize joint and segment work
Introduction
Several researchers have used the principles of energetics to explain the compensatory strategies used by individuals with impairments (e.g., [1], [2], [3]). Relative joint work, or the comparative amount each joint's work contributed to absolute limb work, can reveal the primary limb “drivers” (positive) and “brakers” (negative) during a movement task like walking. However, work is less physically intuitive than more common clinical variables such as joint angles, partly because it is a scalar quantity which does not have a direction.
Previously, researchers have reported the work generated (positive) and absorbed (negative) by each of the joints using line [1], [4] and bar charts [5]. While these graphs can be used to compare joint work across gait intensity and between limbs of the same joint at one intensity, the overlapping lines and error bars can be confusing to interpret. There is a need for a clearly reported approach to visualize and facilitate the interpretation of work variables in a clinical setting.
The objective of this article is to introduce the Constituent Lower Extremity Work (CLEW) approach, a general methodology to visualize and interpret cyclic tasks performed by the lower limbs. The term “constituents” will be used to refer to the hip, knee, ankle, and distal foot of the limb. The utility of this tool is demonstrated by presenting a report with the relative work of the four lower limb constituents in both limbs of a sample of healthy, unimpaired individuals and in the prosthetic and intact limbs of an individual with a unilateral amputation walking on a treadmill.
Section snippets
Methods
As a representative case study, data were collected from an adult individual (height 1.68 m, mass 79.15 kg) walking on an instrumented treadmill (Bertec Corp., Columbus, OH) who required use of an above-knee prosthesis due to a congenital proximal femoral focal deficiency. Reflective markers were positioned using a modification of a six-degree-of-freedom (6-DOF) marker set [6]. A seven-camera motion capture system was used to collect kinematic data (Motion Analysis, Santa Rosa, CA). Motion
Results
Average net 6-DOF limb work, absolute 6-DOF limb work, stride length, and cost-of-transport are all reported in Table 1 for the left and right limbs of the unimpaired individuals (mean ± standard deviation) and the individual with amputation (hereafter noted as subject data). Fig. 2 depicts a typical clinical CLEW report. Fig. 2A summarizes the steps for systematically evaluating a subject's CLEW pie chart and a short interpretation of each variable. Fig. 2B provides an example of a typical CLEW
Discussion
The purpose of this study was to introduce the CLEW approach and demonstrate its utility in quantifying relative constituent work in a succinct and visually informative manner. The size of the pie charts, representing the mechanical cost-of-transport, provides a spatial relationship to interpret the total burden of work for the limb. The designation of positive and negative relative constituent work provides a way to readily compare the contribution of work from each constituent during the
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no financial or personal relationships with individuals or organizations that inappropriately influenced this work.
Acknowledgments
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship under Grant No. 1247394 and by the University of Delaware College of Health Sciences and Mechanical Engineering departments. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. This project was also supported by the BADER consortium, a Department of
References (12)
- et al.
Effects of cadence on energy generation and absorption at lower extremity joints during gait
Clin. Biomech.
(2008) - et al.
Aging modifies joint power and work when gait speeds are matched
Gait Posture
(2011) - et al.
The influence of walking speed on mechanical joint power during gait
Gait Posture
(1997) - et al.
Compensatory mechanisms in below-knee amputee gait in response to increasing steady-state walking speeds
Gait Posture
(2008) - et al.
Changes in knee joint function over a wide range of walking speeds
Clin. Biomech.
(1997) - et al.
Sensitivity of joint moments to changes in walking speed and body-weight-support are interdependent and vary across joints
J. Biomech.
(2013)