Elsevier

Gait & Posture

Volume 58, October 2017, Pages 401-408
Gait & Posture

Full length article
Upper body accelerations during walking are altered in adults with ACL reconstruction

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.08.034Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Examine if ACL reconstruction impacts upper body control during gait.

  • Similar pattern of acceleration for the head, neck and trunk between groups.

  • ACL persons showed decline in ability to attenuate high frequency gait oscillations.

  • ACL persons exhibited loss of smoothness for head acceleration.

  • The effects of ACL reconstruction were not localized to the knee joint.

Abstract

This study was designed to assess and compare the pattern of acceleration from the lower trunk, neck and head regions for individuals with reconstructed ACL compared to healthy controls during walking. Participants with unilateral ACL reconstruction and matched control persons participated in the study. Accelerations were collected using three triaxial accelerometers attached to the head, neck, and lower trunk. Measures of amplitude and signal regularity of the acceleration data were performed. Similarities were seen between both groups with regards to the general acceleration patterns in all three axes. However, the results also revealed that the individuals with ACL reconstruction had significantly greater peak power in the AP direction at higher frequencies, indicating a reduced ability to attenuate frequency signals. Further, the ACL group had a reduced ability to control head motion during gait, as indicated by reduced regularity in VT. Both groups demonstrated a similar pattern of gait-related oscillations across the head, neck and trunk segments. However, adults with a reconstructed ACL demonstrated a reduced capacity to compensate for the higher frequency components of the gait signal, which may have led to a decline in head control. Overall, these findings indicate that previous damage to the ACL is not simply localized to the knee joint, but influences upper body control, too.

Introduction

The anterior cruciate ligament plays an important role in stabilizing the knee joint during walking and running activities. Following injury or damage to this ligament that results in a tear, reconstruction is often advised to improve stability of the knee joint. Unfortunately, while this surgery may lead to short-term benefits for maintaining knee stability, there are long term health concerns for persons who undergo anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). In particular, individuals who undergo ACLR surgery demonstrated a prevalence for developing osteoarthritis in the reconstructed knee in less than 12 years post-surgery [1]. One reason for the development of early-onset osteoarthritis relates to changes in ones walking pattern following ACLR [2], [3]. However, previous reports have struggled to identify clear gait differences for individuals following this surgery. For example, many people with ACLR exhibit similar spatiotemporal parameters [4], [5] and gait kinematics [5], [6], [7] compared to healthy controls. Additionally, similar kinetic and kinematic patterns are observed when compared to the contralateral limb within a single person [8]. The result of these collective findings is that approximately 90% of all ACLR individuals appear clinically to have “normal” knee function, defined by similarities in spatiotemporal parameters and mechanical properties of the knee [9]. The only consistent difference has been with regard to the force developed during walking, with increases in vertical ground reaction forces (GRF) and joint moments being reported for ACLR persons [6].

While the majority of previous studies have focused on the localized effects of this reconstructive surgery (i.e. its effect on the knee joint itself), it is possible that the impact of ACLR could be manifested at other parts of the body. For example, the upper body (i.e., trunk and neck) play an important role in damping gait-related oscillations during locomotion [10], [11], [12] to ensure the head is stabilized [13], [14]. This stabilization is evident in decreased amplitude of acceleration patterns at the head when compared to the lower trunk [15], [16]. Previous research has shown that the ability of the trunk-neck region to effectively control accelerations during walking is affected by both increasing age and for clinical populations [14], [15], [16], [17], [18]. If ACLR affects the capacity of the knee joint to appropriately dissipate forces within the lower limb during walking [19], then it is possible that impact of this surgery may also influence the dynamics of the upper body regions during gait. However, there has been no direct assessment of whether ACLR impacts the ability of the upper body to attenuate oscillations while walking.

This study was designed to assess and compare whether individuals who have had an ACL reconstruction demonstrate upper body acceleration patterns similar to healthy subjects. It was predicted that ACLR individuals would demonstrate a diminished capacity to compensate for gait-related oscillations, especially at higher frequencies.

Section snippets

Participants

Seventeen individuals with unilateral ACLR (age:23.5 ± 2.73 years, height:172.9 ± 9.07 cm, weight:77.4 ± 13.78 kg) and 17 age/height/weight matched control (CTRL) persons (age:25 ± 2.44 years, height:173.2 ± 10.52 cm, weight:75.7 ± 14.97 kg) participated in the study. There were no significant differences between the two groups with regards to age, height, or weight (p’s > 0.05). Inclusion criteria for the CTRL group included no previous history of lower extremity injuries, surgeries, or neuropathy. For the ACLR

Descriptive gait data

There was no significant group difference for preferred gait speed between participants (ACLR: 1.24 ± 0.15meters/sec, CTRL: 1.31 ± 0.16meters/sec; t(132) = 1.54, p = 0.133). An example of the typical acceleration profile for the head and trunk segments across the AP, ML and VT directions is shown in Fig. 1.

RMS acceleration

Fig. 2, which contains mean RMS values for each segment across the two groups, illustrates that the gait-related accelerations decreased from the trunk to the head. In the AP direction, there was a

Discussion

This study was designed to assess and compare the pattern of acceleration for the lower trunk, neck and head for individuals with unilateral ACL reconstruction compared to healthy adults. While there were similarities in the general acceleration patterns between the two groups, the ACLR individuals exhibited a diminished ability to attenuate frequency oscillations in the AP and ML directions. Further, the time-dependent structure of the acceleration signal for the head and neck in the VT

Conclusions

While both groups demonstrated a similar pattern of gait-related accelerations during over-ground walking, subtle differences were found with ACLR individuals demonstrating increased complexity of VT accelerations and a reduced capacity to compensate for accelerations in the AP and ML directions between segments. These results indicate that trunk-neck-head axes of ACLR persons may have a reduced ability to filter out gait-related fluctuations, which has the potential to negatively impact head

Conflicts of interest

None.

References (30)

  • J. Hamill

    A dynamical systems approach to lower extremity running injuries

    Clin. Biomech.

    (1999)
  • N. Cortes et al.

    Differential effects of fatigue on movement variability

    Gait Posture

    (2014)
  • L.S. Lohmander

    The long-term consequence of anterior cruciate ligament and meniscus injuries osteoarthritis

    Am. J. Sports Med.

    (2007)
  • N. Stergiou

    Tibial rotation in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient and ACL-reconstructed knees

    Sports Med.

    (2007)
  • R.J. Butler

    Gait mechanics after ACL reconstruction: implications for the early onset of knee osteoarthritis

    Br. J. Sports Med.

    (2009)
  • Cited by (11)

    • The use of wearable technology as an assessment tool to identify between-limb differences during functional tasks following ACL reconstruction. A scoping review

      2022, Physical Therapy in Sport
      Citation Excerpt :

      Twenty-three were selected for full-text appraisal after the title and abstract screening process (Fig. 1). Twelve were removed after the full-text screening (Armitano et al., 2017; Dowling et al., 2011, 2012; Fong et al., 2011; Hohmann et al., 2015; Kim et al., 2018; Reenalda et al., 2018; Setuain et al., 2015b, 2019a, 2019b; Skvortsov et al., 2020; Tsuruoka et al., 2005). Eleven studies remained and were included in this scoping review (Bailey et al., 2016; Dan et al., 2019; Havens et al., 2018; Kim et al., 2020; Peebles et al., 2019a; Pratt and Sigward, 2018a, 2018b; Setuain et al., 2015a; Sigward et al., 2016; Thomson et al., 2018; Vervaat et al., 2020).

    • Biofeedback augmenting lower limb loading alters the underlying temporal structure of gait following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

      2020, Human Movement Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      This less variable gait behavior has been attributed to antagonist muscle coactivation as a compensatory mechanism to stabilize the knee joint and avoid further structural damage (Hurd & Snyder-Mackler, 2007; Rudolph, Axe, Buchanan, Scholz, & Snyder-Mackler, 2001). Therefore, while joint stability is restored, there is a consecution of secondary issues (e.g., post-traumatic osteoarthritis) that are likely attributed to alterations in functional movement dynamics (Armitano, Morrison, & Russell, 2017; Kurz, Stergiou, Buzzi, & Georgoulis, 2005; Moraiti et al., 2009). Despite high rates of successful surgical and rehabilitative outcomes following ACLR (Deehan, Salmon, Webb, Davies, & Pinczewski, 2000), more than 60% of these individuals develop symptoms of post-traumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA) 10–15 years after surgery (Øiestad et al., 2010).

    • Assessment of the gait-related acceleration patterns in adults with autism spectrum disorder

      2020, Gait and Posture
      Citation Excerpt :

      In addition, measures of each person’s motion in the anterior-posterior (AP), mediolateral (ML), and vertical (VT) directions during each walking trial were attained using three Delsys triaxial accelerometers. These accelerometers were attached to the head (occipital pole), neck (over the C5 spinous process), and lower trunk (over the L3 spinous process) using double-sided tape as per previous studies [14,15]. Accelerometer data were sampled at 148 Hz using Delsys Trigno system (Delsys, Boston, MA).

    • Coupling of motor oscillators – What really happens when you chew gum and walk?

      2019, Neuroscience Letters
      Citation Excerpt :

      Assessment of each person’s gait was collected using three Delsys triaxial accelerometers. These sensors were positioned on the head, lower back (L3 spinous process), and lower leg (distal Achilles tendon) during the walking trials as per our previous research [2]. Gait-related acceleration data was collected at 148 Hz using the Delsys Trigno system (Delsys, Boston, MA), down sampled to 100 Hz and filtered using a second-order low-pass Butterworth filter with a cutoff frequency of 40 Hz.

    • Coordination stability between the legs is reduced after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

      2018, Clinical Biomechanics
      Citation Excerpt :

      A slower walking speed without a concomitant change in cadence suggests the individuals with ACLR adopted shorter step lengths than healthy controls. Slower walking speeds with a shorter step length could be an effort to reduce the magnitude of gait related oscillations in the trunk and head which have been found to be altered in individuals with ACLR (Armitano et al., 2017; Kavanagh et al., 2006). Reduced step length has been observed soon after ACLR surgery, but by eight months significant differences with healthy controls have disappeared (Knoll et al., 2004).

    • Multilayered Metamaterial Antenna for Brain Stroke Imaging System

      2023, 2023 Advances in Science and Engineering Technology International Conferences, ASET 2023
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text