Elsevier

Gait & Posture

Volume 62, May 2018, Pages 317-320
Gait & Posture

Full length article
Is symmetry of loading improved for injured runners during novice barefoot running?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.03.043Get rights and content

Highlights

  • RFS shod runners with prior injury do not have improved symmetry with barefoot FFS.

  • Those with highest asymmetry may have improved symmetry in barefoot FFS condition.

  • Barefoot sensory input may only improve symmetry in those with greatest asymmetry.

Abstract

Background

As barefoot (BF) running provides important sensory information that influence landing patterns, it may also affect loading symmetry.

Research question

The purpose of this investigation was to examine whether symmetry of loading in a group of injured runners would be improved in a novice, barefoot condition.

Methods

Cross-sectional design evaluating 67 injured RFS runners. Each subject ran on an instrumented treadmill, first with their habitual shod pattern and then in a BF condition with a FFS pattern, both at the same self-selected speed. Data were averaged over 10 footstrikes. Variables of interest included vertical average load rate, vertical instantaneous load rate, and resultant instantaneous load rate. Symmetry indices (SI) for full population and within quartiles were compared for each loadrate variable (P ≤ 0.05) to evaluate changes between conditions.

Results

On average, symmetry of loading was similar in a novice BF condition of injured runners compared with their habitual RFS shod condition. However, a subanalysis of quartiles revealed that the injured runners with the highest asymmetry (greatest SI values) displayed significantly lower asymmetry when running BF for all three loadrate measures.

Significance

The addition of sensory input during barefoot running only improves symmetry of loading when habitual loading is highly asymmetric.

Introduction

Walking and running, are considered relatively symmetric activities. When movement patterns become asymmetric, they can disrupt the natural rhythm of the gait. Examples of this include walking with uneven step lengths or with a lateral trunk lean. In theory, these asymmetries can lead to overloading certain musculoskeletal structures, increasing their risk for injury. When ground reaction forces (GRF) become asymmetric, one limb becomes more loaded than the other which can also be associated with injury. For example, Zifchock et al. [1] have shown that the injured limb of runners is associated with the side with the highest impact loading during running. It has been noted that some degree of asymmetry is normal in running [2]. However, when gait asymmetry is above expected differences, the goal of many interventions is to improve the symmetry to reduce injury risk [[3], [4], [5]].

In terms of running, impact loading, specifically GFR loadrates, have been associated with injury in both retrospective [[6], [7]] and prospective [[8], [9]] studies. This impact loading is strongly influenced by footstrike patterns. Runners who land with a forefoot strike (FFS) have significantly lower vertical loadrates compared to those who land with a rearfoot strike (RFS), especially when footwear cushioning is minimized [[10], [11]]. This impact reduction is in part due to the eccentric action of the calf musculature during a FFS landing [12].

Impact loading is also reduced when running barefoot compared with running in cushioned shoes [13]. This has been attributed to two factors. First, barefoot runners are more likely to run with a FFS pattern [14]. This is because the heel pad does not adequately attenuate the impact loads of running and becomes painful when loads exceed those of walking [15]. Additionally, depending on the surface hardness, the sensory input from the plantar surface of the foot influences stiffness of the leg during landing [[16], [17]]. When landing on a hard surface, leg stiffness is reduced and when landing on a soft surface, leg stiffness is increased.

Unfortunately, cushioned footwear may disrupt this important sensory input, likely resulting in altered landing mechanics including dynamic stability [18]. For example, an injured runner may have an associated harder landing on their affected side. The cushioned shoes may make it more difficult to sense this difference in landing. However, landing this hard when barefoot may be very painful. Thus, it is possible that the runner will adapt their mechanics to land softer on that side resulting in less asymmetry. If this is the case, running barefoot may be a way to retrain the symmetry of loading.

Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine differences in asymmetry of loading between shod and novice barefoot conditions. We hypothesize that impact loading will be reduced in both feet in the barefoot conditions. We also expect that the asymmetry of loading variables will be reduced when running barefoot compared to shod.

Section snippets

Methods

Subjects in this study were a subset of runners seeking evaluation at a running injury clinic. Force data from the injured RFS runners who were habitually shod were collected as standard of care as part of a running clinic evaluation, and therefore a waiver of informed consent was granted.

Results

The study group was comprised of 67 runners (34 female, 33 male, average age 37.2 yrs) meeting the inclusion criteria. Runners presented with a variety of running related injuries. Data on demographics and information on recent injury was available on 66 of 67 runners. Thirty-nine of the runners had unilateral injuries and 33 runners localized one or more recent injury to a joint (hip, knee or ankle). All runners completed both condition with nearly no pain. (NPRS = 0.15 ± 0.52). Only 6 of the

Discussion

The purpose of this investigation was to compare symmetry of loadrates between shod and barefoot conditions. We hypothesized that asymmetry would be reduced when additional sensory input was provided. However, we only found this to be true only for runners with the highest degree of asymmetry in their shod condition.

Contrary to our hypotheses, loading symmetry did not improve when sensory input was increased in the BF condition across subjects. When assessing the shod symmetry data by

Conclusions

In summary, the additional sensory input of running barefoot did not improve the average loading symmetry across all runners. However, in the case of the highest degree of shod asymmetry, this was significantly improved when running barefoot. This suggests that training in a barefoot condition may be help in more extreme cases of loading asymmetry.

Conflict of interest statement

No funding was received to support this investigation. Authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose related to this work.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to all of our patients for inspiring our investigation and providing data that we can use to both treat their ailments and further our understanding of running injuries. No funding was received to support this investigation. Authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose related to this work. AST, MCR, STJ, and ISD were responsible for conception and design of the study, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data. PPS contributed to acquisition of data, analysis

References (20)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (11)

  • Impact loading in female runners with single and multiple bone stress injuries during fresh and exerted conditions

    2023, Journal of Sport and Health Science
    Citation Excerpt :

    First, these force data were low-pass filtered at 50 Hz using a zero-phase fourth order Butterworth filter, with foot contacts identified when the vertical force exceeded a threshold of 40 N. The algorithm used to calculate VALR and VILR has been described previously.37 Briefly, a region of interest was defined between the first instance that VGRF exceeded 75% of body weight and the last instance that the slope of the VGRF was >15 body weight/s.

  • Gait parameters, functional performance and physical activity in active and inactive Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

    2022, Gait and Posture
    Citation Excerpt :

    Treadmill GRF data were collected at 1200 Hz and low-pass filtered with a cutoff frequency of 40 Hz using a fourth-order Butterworth filter. VALR was be calculated from the slope of the ΔF/Δt of the most linear portion of the force curve, where ΔF is the change of vertical force and Δt is the change of time (between 20 % and 80 % of the first rise to peak of the vertical GRF [23] or vertical GRF at 13 % of stance in situations where the initial peak is the missing. Vertical GRF impulses were calculated as the integral of vertical GRF over the stance time; both absolute values, and values normalized per unit body weight were calculated [22,24].

  • The value of tibial mounted inertial measurement units to quantify running kinetics in elite football (soccer) players. A reliability and agreement study using a research orientated and a clinically orientated system

    2019, Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    The bilateral distribution of these forces can be quantified using the symmetry index (SI) (Robinson et al., 1987), expressed as a percentage difference between limbs, with a value of zero percent indicating perfect symmetry (Zifchock et al., 2008). It has been hypothesised that kinetic asymmetries may increase injury risk due to between-limb loading differences (Tenforde et al., 2018), although this is currently unsubstantiated. Indeed, some asymmetry appears to occur naturally at running speeds, where uninjured runners have shown asymmetry values of 3.1% for vertical GRF and 31.7% for tibial shock values (Zifchock et al., 2006).

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text